HAMAS: Jihad Remains Alive

Already known for being an unpredictable and ruthless terrorist organization, the Harakat al Muqawana al Islamiyyah –HAMAS has been responsible for numerous attacks on Israeli soldiers and innocent people.
The essence of its existence is to carry on with the destruction of the Israeli government, the eradication of the Jewish people and the reinforcement and establishment of Islam in the region. Its essence is similar to the Palestine Liberation Organization terrorist organization and it also rejects politics and diplomacy between Washington and the Palestinian Authority in regards to the acceptance of the Jewish State, its people safety and security, land demarcation and control over settlements, and the frustration of continuing with the existence of a Jewish world.
Hamas has been very inpatient with the prolonged efforts of the PLO to free the occupied territories by diplomatic means generating a coalition between Hamas and the Iranian government of Almadinejhad opposing to any peace treaty agreement between Israel and the PLO.
Hamas should not only be seen as a terrorist organization trying to destabilize peace in the region and should not be underestimated as a threat to the United States of America. Instead, Hamas should be given the necessary attention for its members’ commitment to self-immolation and its member’s sense of belonging to a large socio-religious movement, and its massive grass-roots support in the region. Its military body preserves the young life of its members for self-immolation, a very respected and glorified act to become a martyr. The Iranian monetary support for the families of the martyrs is essential to gain acceptance and more recruitment to include the expenses for resettlement of all suicide bomber families who lose their homes as a result of Israeli retribution.
The United States of America not only deal with Iraq and Afghanistan in the war against terrorism but with the constant Arab unification in their desperation to destroy Israel. After the PLO elections, Hamas was empowered itself by assuming high control of the PLO and has established better relations with Iran. Isn’t this a radical religious coalition we must give the necessary attention?
While we are fighting a war in Baghdad and Kabul trying to establish democracy we are lacking attention to terrorist organizations such as PLO and Hamas plus the Iranian aggression dressed diplomatically to avoid detection. The war in Iraq has benefit Iran in many aspects, leaving it as the only regional power that was endowed with both a large population and plentiful natural resources, and increased state power and control over minor states breathing radical and fanatical oxygen. With the assassination of Benazir Bhutto in Pakistan by the extremists of Al Q’aeda, as pointed out, and with the terrible outcome of the war against terrorism in Iraqi soil, the United States of America is far from winning this war and it is provoking the regrouping of not only Al Q’aeda but other terrorist organizations in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Yemen, and Sudan, for example, to minimize its vulnerabilities and somehow upgrade their underground operations, all as part of a well organized military body.
Allahu Akbar, and Mawt lil-Yahud greeted all the speakers in a 1995 Hamas rally in Gaza. It means: “God is Great, Death to the Jews”, as reported by Steven Emerson to the US House of Representatives early 1996. Their jihad spirit has not died; it still vivid and we must do something about it. We have to dismantle terrorist organizations from its roots, every single one, every single terrorist, every single organization committed to interrupt or threat world peace. In other words, have a real war against terrorism without taking in consideration any type of interests. There is a new era of Palestinian self-rule with the addition of Hamas influence, this injection of venom is prepared to deliver the most outrageous and sanguinary terrorist attacks in the promised-land and abroad, and the increment in proliferation of weapons, explosives, and terrorist training is backing up their commitments. Hamas was hungry for power and right after its political triumph in 2006, less than a year after Israel’s withdrawal from this coastal enclave, the terrorist organization has been meticulously observing Israeli security to obstruct peace and continue with their bloody agenda. It doesn’t matter if Sunnis and Shiites are not in agreement with everything, but be sure that they both agree in wiping out Israel from the face of the world.
Hundreds of treaties, pacts and diplomatic conversations were delivered during the Arafat era. Have those been any good? He always tried to keep the Israeli-Palestinian relations at a “manageable level” as expressed by Steve Emerson in his report, but there was never a real commitment to stop PLO aggression, or to condemn Hamas death squads operations in the region. Internal PLO corruption entertains its members when they don’t think in attacking Israel, which it tell us that some kind of weak foundation brick is about to collapse if not completely, but at least sporadically. The tinted spirit of the organization is tarnished a little bit if not a lot of the new Hamas majority, source of full commitment to eradicate Israel and recuperate land in the region. They are so involved and determined to do so that they are currently looking foreign contributors to compensate for any cutoff of Western donor funds. So lets pay attention to Iran, Saudi Arabia, and other Arab state in the Gulf region.

HAMAS: Against Israel and Fatah

Between the State of Israel, The Palestinian Authority, and Hamas relies the complicated formula for peace in the region. As easy as it may sound, it is not. Mr. Abbas, the leader of the PA and head of the Fatah political has been trying to negotiate more with Israel to obtain better treatment, more opportunities, and less hectic measurements to avoid crippling the PA finances.
The West Bank, for example, has demonstrated more progress, if this is the right word, than in Gaza Strip. Productive Israeli-Palestinian meetings may have been the reason for it as well as less firm checkpoints and roadblocks that cripple the economy. Abbas has full control of the West Bank but cannot impose the same in Gaza Strip; the main reason is Hamas. International aid agencies put Gaza’s poverty rate at 80 percent, and most Gazans survive on United Nations handouts and aid from Hamas’ patrons, such as Iran (Foreign Affairs, Volume 89, No. 5, page 50).
Hamas still broadcasting to the Palestinians in Gaza that the Fatah political strategy is too open to communication with Israel even though Israeli rockets damaged their soil. Hamas try to disintegrate all diplomatic relations between Palestine and Israel but encounter Abbas in the middle. Hamas obtained more power since they are the majority in congress after the 2006 victory and are always pushing for the continuance of violence against Israel as well as maintaining vivid the desire of the complete destruction of the Jewish state.
The alternatives for peace include more effective communication and diplomatic resolutions between Hamas and Israel’s National Security Council, retake Gaza before Hamas get any stronger, or increase economic pressure and military operations to preempt terrorist attacks from Gaza into Israel. The most desirable event is to turn Hamas to be more cooperative with the PA and support Abbas rather than be against him. However, as the days pass by, Israelis still fear that Hamas continue building its capabilities, obtaining more economic support from other Arab nations, and deal with the reality that in Gaza Strip other minor terrorist organizations start to flourish, like the Salafi jihadist terrorist group. In the meantime, Washington will continue to broker peace talks and diplomatic encounters, a well-known melody nobody is willing to dance. President Obama will continue pressing Israel to ease the blockade, elimination of some of the restrictions, and to trust the United States for help when needed. History can show us that Hamas does not welcome diplomatic negotiations. They are willing to die for the cause and for the destruction of the State of Israel. One thing is for sure, Hamas is growing militarily and in members committed without hesitation to destroy Israel, and if possible, any Palestinian not focused on the same objective. Iran is behind the curtains shuffling money, armament, and providing training to its members. Hamas has diminished and almost stopped attacking Israel not because it is abiding by any diplomatic agreement but because the benefits overweight the cost, at least for now. Hamas also admits that hitting more Israeli civilians, especially with the longer-range Katyusha rockets it will give Israel an excuse to hit Gaza and kill 2,000 people according to Hamas top leaders.

The False Religion of Peace

In the year 610 A.C., a commerce man called Mahoma misinterpret the sacred books of Christians and Jews and self-proclaimed as the Prophet from God (Apoc.216:13). He claimed that Jesus was a simple prophet and that even Jesus announced him as the Savior. This is how Islam was born and along with it, the Quran, a triturated version of the Bible and the Torah.
History has witnessed the numerous Christian populations and settlements that fell under Muslim governance, torturing their political and religious representatives, executing all those who oppose to conversion, slavering children, and demolishing religious infrastructures other than Muslim, and building more Mosques to establish a well settlement in place.
Islam contains political and religious ingredients in its foundation with the purpose of disseminating terror around the world by executing threats and paramilitary activities “in the name of Allah.” With the fall of the Ottoman Empire after WWII, Islam suffered a huge impact that weakened its political and religious structure, but the promise against the Christian and Jewish worlds remained pending and never forgotten. From the Islam perspective, the Occident needs to be annihilated at whatever cost. The promise to regroup and be a strong force in Europe was part of the strategy that today we can see it as an accomplished goal. Muslim cleric Qaradawi from Egypt affirmed that the regain of Europe was a victory for Islam.
If we pay attention to the spread of Islam in the world we can easily determine that it hasn’t been peaceful but a bloody corrosion. In Africa, for example Jihad has expanded tremendously raping non-Muslim women, destroying nom-Muslim houses of worship, imposing fear, threatening and killing people, and forcing entire communities to conversion into Islam. On October 6, 2006 in Ethiopia suffered hundreds of assassinations during a confrontation between Christians and Muslims. A group of Muslims opposed to the Christian celebration of Meskel, a religious party of the Orthodox Church. On December 18, 2007 thirteen businesses were destroyed by the evil hands of pro-Muslim forces. In the city of Copto it was prohibited to build or even repair churches of non-Muslim nomenclature, and higher taxes were imposed by the government for being a non-Muslim population. In Asia, for example Jihad has also expanded tremendously. On October 24, 2005 three Indonesian teen girls, Theresia Morangke, Yarni Samubue, and Alfita Poliwo were decapitated for resisting to converting into Islam. On September 22, 2006 three Indonesian Christian men executed for plotting attacks against Muslims. In Philippines, Islamic guerrillas decapitated many Christian preachers in the city of Jolo. In Oriental Timor, the orphanage Juan Bautista was attacked by Muslim militants and many of the female students were sexually abused. Also, 15 Christian preachers were assassinated in the cities of Dili and Boucau. Thousands of Christians have left the Middle East due to the constant threat of Muslims such as in Lebanon, where Christians represent now half of the population.
The future of the world is critical. Europe is already “Eurabia” with over 50 million of Muslims responding to the predictions of Ayatollah Ali Jamenei of Iraq, who saw this occupation coming without the guns and swords.
We don’t have to go too far to experience the spread of Islam. Both of our borders are sensible and exposed to the smell and dark cloud extremists usually possess; Canada population of Muslims have increased tremendously in the last decade, and Mexican cities are already tasting the conversion of its citizens into Islam. Are we ready to confront the reality of a corrosive spread of Islam?

Radical Islam: A Growing Cancer

Without a doubt, the events of September 11, 2001 marked the initiation of the efforts to fight terrorism. We did not know the enemy’s nature, short and long term capabilities, vested commitment to destroy our nation, and what strategy to use to neutralize, control, and eliminate the threat of the enemy.
The good thing is that we were conscious enough to understand that terrorists meant business and that their commitment goes beyond seriousness and extremism. The bad thing is that after more than 10 years of war shifted from Iraqi to Afghani territory, the leader of Al Q’aeda, Osama bin Laden still is at large. The war has affected also our allies and their compromise to team up in the fight against terrorism. By the time America understood the significance and popularity of the growth and danger of Radical Islam, European nations’ power has long since faded due to the expansion of the cancerous virus called Radical Islam. An ongoing mistake America embraces from one administration to the next is to see the Middle East as cleanly divided between two arenas: a moderate, pro-American that ought to be bolstered and a militant, pro-Iranian one that needs to be contained. That conception is not the reality and we must not continue seeing this as such because it does not allow intelligence strategists to counter attack the threat efficiently. America still ignores the role of new prominent elements at the door of terror such as Turkey as a clear sign of not realizing the changes in the composition of the Middle East. If we ignore those changes, we are making it more complicated to understand the political changes in the region. How are we going to assess Saudi Arabia’s resumed dialogue with the terrorist organization Hamas? How are we going to assess the Saudi ties with Syria? How are we going to asses Damascus’ regime involved in the shipment of armament and explosives to the terrorist organization Hezbollah? How are going to assess the strength and rapid alliance of Iran with Syria, Yemen, and Damascus? And, how are we going to assess the relations with Turkey when this nation has developed strong ties with Syria, mediating a nuclear deal with Iran, and proven to have strong ties with the terrorist organization Hamas?
We started the war on terror by invading the wrong country; that’s a fact. However, the capture of Saddam Hussein created the curtain to disregard negative comments about this erroneous first step and the invasion became the masterpiece of the entire strategy. The problem was that we failed to maintain a strong and direct defined objective as we did during Desert Storm during the George H.W. Bush administration by forcing Iraq out of Kuwait territory in 1991. Consequently, the assembly of multi-national forces maintained strong political ties for years to come, as it did, better than before, the results of the peace conference in Madrid to improve the relations Arab-Israeli. The Clinton administration contained Iran and Iraq while managing the Arab-Israeli everlasting conflict through diplomacy. Between 1991 until the end of the Clinton administration, America was able to neutralize the region’s three most critical arenas of conflict: the Arab-Persian fault line, the occupied Palestinian territories, and the time-bomb called Lebanon. During the George W. Bush administration, the handling of the crystal ball of the Israeli-Arab affairs shifted more to the Israeli side and the Intifada of 2000 put the Palestinians and all the terrorist groups they support in a situation that only grew more and throw the pendulum to the opposite side of the political relations in the region.
The George W. Bush policy of “with us or against us” to fight terrorism created animosity toward the United States and it promptly became widespread. We were at war and we needed to deal with animosity as in any other military intervention. The results of the war 10 years later reflect the total destruction of the sanguinary regime in Iraq but it allowed Iran spread its influence beyond its borders toward the Arab world. Hezbollah has strengthen its forces and commitment to annihilate anti-Muslims, and the bankruptcy of peace processes boosted Hamas and gave the terrorists the clear arena to adhere to the fatwa issued in 1998 by Osama bin Laden. What have we done wrong to allow Syria its continuance in relations with Radical Islamist terrorist organizations? What have we done wrong to allow Hezbollah infiltrate the political hemisphere in Lebanon? What have we done wrong when trying to sit in the same table Israel, Saudi-Arabia, and Iraq if these critical chess-pieces never shared neither values nor interests? What have we done right or maybe we think is right but it is just an invisible strategy from Syria to be willing to negotiate peace relations with Israel while Iran has openly called for its destruction? Practically, no country in the Middle East has a positive agenda or is in a position to successfully advance one as long as Radical Islam heart still beating.
It won’t be easy for the United States to undertake strong, effective, and lethal measures against Radical Islam. It may increase regional divisions, increase more tension, and increase the chances of more conflicts in different territories. President Barack Hussein Obama started his administration with the unmistakable decision and ambition of reversing the results of the war on terrorism but he has forgotten to close the book on failed policies and strategies of the past, and design a strong arrow that carries the strongest venom to the heart of Radical Islam.

Islamic Fatwa vs. American Political Correctness

Is this the time to start racial and religious profiling? Can this approach be the response or process to the TSA increasing safety measures and security? The answer is yes, at least this is the opinion and recommendation of Asra Nomani, a Muslim who supports religious and racial profiling to enhance the security of airports and other points of entry to the United States. We have embraced the nation into so many political correctness attitude that is choking us and does not let us fight back the forces of aversion, which is represented by Radical Islam. In 1998, Osama bin Laden issued a "fatwa" indicating that airlines and airports are legitimate targets for Muslims. The response can be easily seen in the threats and or terrorist activities in Glascow, London, JFK, and others as well as airlines attacks with one common denominator called "Muslim." Nomani indicated that we can be discriminating wihout being discriminatory. It is time to focus on the threat of terrorism and forget the stupid and unnecessary political correctness when dealing with the leprosy of humanity, terrorists. Osama bin Laden was serious about the decret and took charge of an international plan, which continues to be the threat to the Western hemisphere, especially the United States as it is against the State of Israel. While the leader of Al Q'aeda plans and executes according to the fatwa, Americans worry about political correctness and still surviving an almost failed war on terrorism going into its eleven year. Religion and race have to be part of the threat assessment for the intelligence community. It is a matter and need of being realistic of the perpretators, the countries they are coming from, the language they speak, the frequency they travel, and the way they dress. The assessment needs to be conducted constantly and meticulously. The concern of civil rights movements will always interfere when pulling the racial profile card, and this is enough for politicians that do not concentrate on the real threat but the feelings of groups concerned mostly on their rights than on the nation's sovereignty.

Threat After the Livermore Study Group: Radical Islam

"Of all the threats that could inflict major damage to the US, terrorists using weapons of mass destruction is the threat for which the nation is least prepared," was the conclusion of a 1996 inteligence study chaired by former Central Intelligence Agency director James Woosley. Known as the Livermore Study Group, its main objective was to identify current threats against the United States, as to the ways to mitigate risk, and to have a better management and knowledge of weapons of mass destruction that may end up in the wrong hands.
Usually the wrong hands are correlated with the wrong brains and any adversary to Western culture is a potential threat. A national nascent policy that addresses the threat of weapons of mass destruction does not help much either. How do our enemies see this new phase in our national security system? Very tentative.
The threat of Iran, North Korea, China, India, Yemen, Afghanistan, and similar nations is vivid. The chaotic and uncontrollable border security between the American and Mexican lines adds wood to the terrorism fire. The familiarization, commercial trading, and establishment of mutual relations between North Korea, Iran, and Venezuela, descentralizes the threat to the southern part of the hemisphere making it a broad and massive threat to our resources. The spread of the threat will go as far as we allow it to go. The threat is against us and we must act promptly, firmly, and effectively.
No control and/or elimination of the threat will be ever successful with diplomacy. We continue experimenting with diplomacy because our nature takes over. We need to shift to the execution of strategies that abolishes the threat from its roots. If this means to put to sleep every terrorist caught, this is exactly what is going to bring victory. No other plan will be victorious, no other alternative will defeat terrorism, no diplomacy has ever been effective against terrorism, and no mercy shall be impossed when dealing with the threat of radical Islam.
The Livermore Study Group has warned us of the need of multilayered defense from detection and prevention to reversal and response to counterrest the threat of weapons of mass destruction. Taking in consideration that the study was done 14 years ago as a proactive approach after the 1993 coward terrorist attack to the World Trade Center in New York City, and the 1995 henious terrorist attack to the Alfred Murray federal building in Oklahoma City, the threat of terrorism has been given attention but not the necessary one.
In 2001, the conclusion of an unfinished business was clear after the complete destruction of the world economic icon, the World Trade Center. World report footage has shown Islamic celebrations around the world for what for us were tears, for them were joyful parties.
The Livermore Study Group could not predict that a WMD by the denomination of "aircraft" was possible or tentatively useful for the radicals that died in the name of their God. No further intelligence study has proposed that dying in the name of God is considered a threat to our society. Religion and politics does not mix, to some scholars. Religion is as powerful as it is politics; the only difference is that politicians have the control of the dissemination of news, reports, and critical and real threats. The people will be exposed to what governments are allowing them to know. This is not a matter of democracy, republic, dictartorship, or anarchy. This is a matter of a rusty, nasty, and controlled political agenda that acts like a virus in all societies. However, religion is blantly and straightforward. We, Americans are the enemy of Islam. The world population is changing and nations around the world are experiencing Muslim growth, and so is the threat. Radical Islam is committed to erradicate all of those that are not Muslims, period.
The point is made. Can we adopt a diplomatic approach to prevent the enemy from killing us? I think, this question needs to be answered by Barack Hussein Obama, the first president of Muslim roots. The threat of weapons of mass destruction still latent while Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, and North Korea are still hosting terrorists to attack our freedom.

History of Ignorance: What America is Good at.

By unanumous decision a city commision panel approved the project of building a mosque nearby ground zero in New York City.
Great wars have been won due to the use of tactical psychological operations, and this may be the one tactic to the Muslim world to enter deep in the heart of democracy to disseminate hate, and jihad to the United States.
The mosque, which is similar to say "house of terror," cannot be built nearby, nor far away in our own soil. Our history of tolerance, compassion, and ignorance is allowing for this to happen.
Besides the fact that this project is a direct spit in the tombs of the martyrs and victims of the suicidal, coward, and henious terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, it also represents our weakness, and empathy with the evil forces of aversion that are eliminating worldwide the parameters of democracy.
France, England, and Canada to name a few nations, have ben invaded by the leprosy of Islam as a time-bomb ready to explode. They are just sleepers.
The Department of Homeland Security forgot to include entities such as the US Department of Labor, and US Department of Education, to name a few to regulate, control, identify, and eliminate sources of Islamic context oriented to the dissemination of terrorist interests throughout the channels of our freedom.
Building a house of terror nearby ground zero is a total disrespect that politicians still don't get it . The ignorant politicians excuse themselves by indicating that in America we have the right of freedom of religion and freedom of assembly. The house of terror will be pretty soon packed with anti-American law, anti-American freedom, and everything they can in the name of the Almighty.
Wake up America!! You are the only 100% responsible party in this huge, exhaust, and terrible decision maker. America does not need mosques, it needs schools. America does not need jihad, it needs freedom.

Do not be ignorant of what is happening in your own house,
Be firm and never let the excrement of mankind, radical Islam, be near you at anytime.