In the year 610 A.C., a commerce man called Mahoma misinterpret the sacred books of Christians and Jews and self-proclaimed as the Prophet from God (Apoc.216:13). He claimed that Jesus was a simple prophet and that even Jesus announced him as the Savior. This is how Islam was born and along with it, the Quran, a triturated version of the Bible and the Torah.
History has witnessed the numerous Christian populations and settlements that fell under Muslim governance, torturing their political and religious representatives, executing all those who oppose to conversion, slavering children, and demolishing religious infrastructures other than Muslim, and building more Mosques to establish a well settlement in place.
Islam contains political and religious ingredients in its foundation with the purpose of disseminating terror around the world by executing threats and paramilitary activities “in the name of Allah.” With the fall of the Ottoman Empire after WWII, Islam suffered a huge impact that weakened its political and religious structure, but the promise against the Christian and Jewish worlds remained pending and never forgotten. From the Islam perspective, the Occident needs to be annihilated at whatever cost. The promise to regroup and be a strong force in Europe was part of the strategy that today we can see it as an accomplished goal. Muslim cleric Qaradawi from Egypt affirmed that the regain of Europe was a victory for Islam.
If we pay attention to the spread of Islam in the world we can easily determine that it hasn’t been peaceful but a bloody corrosion. In Africa, for example Jihad has expanded tremendously raping non-Muslim women, destroying nom-Muslim houses of worship, imposing fear, threatening and killing people, and forcing entire communities to conversion into Islam. On October 6, 2006 in Ethiopia suffered hundreds of assassinations during a confrontation between Christians and Muslims. A group of Muslims opposed to the Christian celebration of Meskel, a religious party of the Orthodox Church. On December 18, 2007 thirteen businesses were destroyed by the evil hands of pro-Muslim forces. In the city of Copto it was prohibited to build or even repair churches of non-Muslim nomenclature, and higher taxes were imposed by the government for being a non-Muslim population. In Asia, for example Jihad has also expanded tremendously. On October 24, 2005 three Indonesian teen girls, Theresia Morangke, Yarni Samubue, and Alfita Poliwo were decapitated for resisting to converting into Islam. On September 22, 2006 three Indonesian Christian men executed for plotting attacks against Muslims. In Philippines, Islamic guerrillas decapitated many Christian preachers in the city of Jolo. In Oriental Timor, the orphanage Juan Bautista was attacked by Muslim militants and many of the female students were sexually abused. Also, 15 Christian preachers were assassinated in the cities of Dili and Boucau. Thousands of Christians have left the Middle East due to the constant threat of Muslims such as in Lebanon, where Christians represent now half of the population.
The future of the world is critical. Europe is already “Eurabia” with over 50 million of Muslims responding to the predictions of Ayatollah Ali Jamenei of Iraq, who saw this occupation coming without the guns and swords.
We don’t have to go too far to experience the spread of Islam. Both of our borders are sensible and exposed to the smell and dark cloud extremists usually possess; Canada population of Muslims have increased tremendously in the last decade, and Mexican cities are already tasting the conversion of its citizens into Islam. Are we ready to confront the reality of a corrosive spread of Islam?
Saturday, December 18, 2010
Radical Islam: A Growing Cancer
Without a doubt, the events of September 11, 2001 marked the initiation of the efforts to fight terrorism. We did not know the enemy’s nature, short and long term capabilities, vested commitment to destroy our nation, and what strategy to use to neutralize, control, and eliminate the threat of the enemy.
The good thing is that we were conscious enough to understand that terrorists meant business and that their commitment goes beyond seriousness and extremism. The bad thing is that after more than 10 years of war shifted from Iraqi to Afghani territory, the leader of Al Q’aeda, Osama bin Laden still is at large. The war has affected also our allies and their compromise to team up in the fight against terrorism. By the time America understood the significance and popularity of the growth and danger of Radical Islam, European nations’ power has long since faded due to the expansion of the cancerous virus called Radical Islam. An ongoing mistake America embraces from one administration to the next is to see the Middle East as cleanly divided between two arenas: a moderate, pro-American that ought to be bolstered and a militant, pro-Iranian one that needs to be contained. That conception is not the reality and we must not continue seeing this as such because it does not allow intelligence strategists to counter attack the threat efficiently. America still ignores the role of new prominent elements at the door of terror such as Turkey as a clear sign of not realizing the changes in the composition of the Middle East. If we ignore those changes, we are making it more complicated to understand the political changes in the region. How are we going to assess Saudi Arabia’s resumed dialogue with the terrorist organization Hamas? How are we going to assess the Saudi ties with Syria? How are we going to asses Damascus’ regime involved in the shipment of armament and explosives to the terrorist organization Hezbollah? How are going to assess the strength and rapid alliance of Iran with Syria, Yemen, and Damascus? And, how are we going to assess the relations with Turkey when this nation has developed strong ties with Syria, mediating a nuclear deal with Iran, and proven to have strong ties with the terrorist organization Hamas?
We started the war on terror by invading the wrong country; that’s a fact. However, the capture of Saddam Hussein created the curtain to disregard negative comments about this erroneous first step and the invasion became the masterpiece of the entire strategy. The problem was that we failed to maintain a strong and direct defined objective as we did during Desert Storm during the George H.W. Bush administration by forcing Iraq out of Kuwait territory in 1991. Consequently, the assembly of multi-national forces maintained strong political ties for years to come, as it did, better than before, the results of the peace conference in Madrid to improve the relations Arab-Israeli. The Clinton administration contained Iran and Iraq while managing the Arab-Israeli everlasting conflict through diplomacy. Between 1991 until the end of the Clinton administration, America was able to neutralize the region’s three most critical arenas of conflict: the Arab-Persian fault line, the occupied Palestinian territories, and the time-bomb called Lebanon. During the George W. Bush administration, the handling of the crystal ball of the Israeli-Arab affairs shifted more to the Israeli side and the Intifada of 2000 put the Palestinians and all the terrorist groups they support in a situation that only grew more and throw the pendulum to the opposite side of the political relations in the region.
The George W. Bush policy of “with us or against us” to fight terrorism created animosity toward the United States and it promptly became widespread. We were at war and we needed to deal with animosity as in any other military intervention. The results of the war 10 years later reflect the total destruction of the sanguinary regime in Iraq but it allowed Iran spread its influence beyond its borders toward the Arab world. Hezbollah has strengthen its forces and commitment to annihilate anti-Muslims, and the bankruptcy of peace processes boosted Hamas and gave the terrorists the clear arena to adhere to the fatwa issued in 1998 by Osama bin Laden. What have we done wrong to allow Syria its continuance in relations with Radical Islamist terrorist organizations? What have we done wrong to allow Hezbollah infiltrate the political hemisphere in Lebanon? What have we done wrong when trying to sit in the same table Israel, Saudi-Arabia, and Iraq if these critical chess-pieces never shared neither values nor interests? What have we done right or maybe we think is right but it is just an invisible strategy from Syria to be willing to negotiate peace relations with Israel while Iran has openly called for its destruction? Practically, no country in the Middle East has a positive agenda or is in a position to successfully advance one as long as Radical Islam heart still beating.
It won’t be easy for the United States to undertake strong, effective, and lethal measures against Radical Islam. It may increase regional divisions, increase more tension, and increase the chances of more conflicts in different territories. President Barack Hussein Obama started his administration with the unmistakable decision and ambition of reversing the results of the war on terrorism but he has forgotten to close the book on failed policies and strategies of the past, and design a strong arrow that carries the strongest venom to the heart of Radical Islam.
The good thing is that we were conscious enough to understand that terrorists meant business and that their commitment goes beyond seriousness and extremism. The bad thing is that after more than 10 years of war shifted from Iraqi to Afghani territory, the leader of Al Q’aeda, Osama bin Laden still is at large. The war has affected also our allies and their compromise to team up in the fight against terrorism. By the time America understood the significance and popularity of the growth and danger of Radical Islam, European nations’ power has long since faded due to the expansion of the cancerous virus called Radical Islam. An ongoing mistake America embraces from one administration to the next is to see the Middle East as cleanly divided between two arenas: a moderate, pro-American that ought to be bolstered and a militant, pro-Iranian one that needs to be contained. That conception is not the reality and we must not continue seeing this as such because it does not allow intelligence strategists to counter attack the threat efficiently. America still ignores the role of new prominent elements at the door of terror such as Turkey as a clear sign of not realizing the changes in the composition of the Middle East. If we ignore those changes, we are making it more complicated to understand the political changes in the region. How are we going to assess Saudi Arabia’s resumed dialogue with the terrorist organization Hamas? How are we going to assess the Saudi ties with Syria? How are we going to asses Damascus’ regime involved in the shipment of armament and explosives to the terrorist organization Hezbollah? How are going to assess the strength and rapid alliance of Iran with Syria, Yemen, and Damascus? And, how are we going to assess the relations with Turkey when this nation has developed strong ties with Syria, mediating a nuclear deal with Iran, and proven to have strong ties with the terrorist organization Hamas?
We started the war on terror by invading the wrong country; that’s a fact. However, the capture of Saddam Hussein created the curtain to disregard negative comments about this erroneous first step and the invasion became the masterpiece of the entire strategy. The problem was that we failed to maintain a strong and direct defined objective as we did during Desert Storm during the George H.W. Bush administration by forcing Iraq out of Kuwait territory in 1991. Consequently, the assembly of multi-national forces maintained strong political ties for years to come, as it did, better than before, the results of the peace conference in Madrid to improve the relations Arab-Israeli. The Clinton administration contained Iran and Iraq while managing the Arab-Israeli everlasting conflict through diplomacy. Between 1991 until the end of the Clinton administration, America was able to neutralize the region’s three most critical arenas of conflict: the Arab-Persian fault line, the occupied Palestinian territories, and the time-bomb called Lebanon. During the George W. Bush administration, the handling of the crystal ball of the Israeli-Arab affairs shifted more to the Israeli side and the Intifada of 2000 put the Palestinians and all the terrorist groups they support in a situation that only grew more and throw the pendulum to the opposite side of the political relations in the region.
The George W. Bush policy of “with us or against us” to fight terrorism created animosity toward the United States and it promptly became widespread. We were at war and we needed to deal with animosity as in any other military intervention. The results of the war 10 years later reflect the total destruction of the sanguinary regime in Iraq but it allowed Iran spread its influence beyond its borders toward the Arab world. Hezbollah has strengthen its forces and commitment to annihilate anti-Muslims, and the bankruptcy of peace processes boosted Hamas and gave the terrorists the clear arena to adhere to the fatwa issued in 1998 by Osama bin Laden. What have we done wrong to allow Syria its continuance in relations with Radical Islamist terrorist organizations? What have we done wrong to allow Hezbollah infiltrate the political hemisphere in Lebanon? What have we done wrong when trying to sit in the same table Israel, Saudi-Arabia, and Iraq if these critical chess-pieces never shared neither values nor interests? What have we done right or maybe we think is right but it is just an invisible strategy from Syria to be willing to negotiate peace relations with Israel while Iran has openly called for its destruction? Practically, no country in the Middle East has a positive agenda or is in a position to successfully advance one as long as Radical Islam heart still beating.
It won’t be easy for the United States to undertake strong, effective, and lethal measures against Radical Islam. It may increase regional divisions, increase more tension, and increase the chances of more conflicts in different territories. President Barack Hussein Obama started his administration with the unmistakable decision and ambition of reversing the results of the war on terrorism but he has forgotten to close the book on failed policies and strategies of the past, and design a strong arrow that carries the strongest venom to the heart of Radical Islam.
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Islamic Fatwa vs. American Political Correctness
Is this the time to start racial and religious profiling? Can this approach be the response or process to the TSA increasing safety measures and security? The answer is yes, at least this is the opinion and recommendation of Asra Nomani, a Muslim who supports religious and racial profiling to enhance the security of airports and other points of entry to the United States. We have embraced the nation into so many political correctness attitude that is choking us and does not let us fight back the forces of aversion, which is represented by Radical Islam. In 1998, Osama bin Laden issued a "fatwa" indicating that airlines and airports are legitimate targets for Muslims. The response can be easily seen in the threats and or terrorist activities in Glascow, London, JFK, and others as well as airlines attacks with one common denominator called "Muslim." Nomani indicated that we can be discriminating wihout being discriminatory. It is time to focus on the threat of terrorism and forget the stupid and unnecessary political correctness when dealing with the leprosy of humanity, terrorists. Osama bin Laden was serious about the decret and took charge of an international plan, which continues to be the threat to the Western hemisphere, especially the United States as it is against the State of Israel. While the leader of Al Q'aeda plans and executes according to the fatwa, Americans worry about political correctness and still surviving an almost failed war on terrorism going into its eleven year. Religion and race have to be part of the threat assessment for the intelligence community. It is a matter and need of being realistic of the perpretators, the countries they are coming from, the language they speak, the frequency they travel, and the way they dress. The assessment needs to be conducted constantly and meticulously. The concern of civil rights movements will always interfere when pulling the racial profile card, and this is enough for politicians that do not concentrate on the real threat but the feelings of groups concerned mostly on their rights than on the nation's sovereignty.
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Threat After the Livermore Study Group: Radical Islam
"Of all the threats that could inflict major damage to the US, terrorists using weapons of mass destruction is the threat for which the nation is least prepared," was the conclusion of a 1996 inteligence study chaired by former Central Intelligence Agency director James Woosley. Known as the Livermore Study Group, its main objective was to identify current threats against the United States, as to the ways to mitigate risk, and to have a better management and knowledge of weapons of mass destruction that may end up in the wrong hands.
Usually the wrong hands are correlated with the wrong brains and any adversary to Western culture is a potential threat. A national nascent policy that addresses the threat of weapons of mass destruction does not help much either. How do our enemies see this new phase in our national security system? Very tentative.
The threat of Iran, North Korea, China, India, Yemen, Afghanistan, and similar nations is vivid. The chaotic and uncontrollable border security between the American and Mexican lines adds wood to the terrorism fire. The familiarization, commercial trading, and establishment of mutual relations between North Korea, Iran, and Venezuela, descentralizes the threat to the southern part of the hemisphere making it a broad and massive threat to our resources. The spread of the threat will go as far as we allow it to go. The threat is against us and we must act promptly, firmly, and effectively.
No control and/or elimination of the threat will be ever successful with diplomacy. We continue experimenting with diplomacy because our nature takes over. We need to shift to the execution of strategies that abolishes the threat from its roots. If this means to put to sleep every terrorist caught, this is exactly what is going to bring victory. No other plan will be victorious, no other alternative will defeat terrorism, no diplomacy has ever been effective against terrorism, and no mercy shall be impossed when dealing with the threat of radical Islam.
The Livermore Study Group has warned us of the need of multilayered defense from detection and prevention to reversal and response to counterrest the threat of weapons of mass destruction. Taking in consideration that the study was done 14 years ago as a proactive approach after the 1993 coward terrorist attack to the World Trade Center in New York City, and the 1995 henious terrorist attack to the Alfred Murray federal building in Oklahoma City, the threat of terrorism has been given attention but not the necessary one.
In 2001, the conclusion of an unfinished business was clear after the complete destruction of the world economic icon, the World Trade Center. World report footage has shown Islamic celebrations around the world for what for us were tears, for them were joyful parties.
The Livermore Study Group could not predict that a WMD by the denomination of "aircraft" was possible or tentatively useful for the radicals that died in the name of their God. No further intelligence study has proposed that dying in the name of God is considered a threat to our society. Religion and politics does not mix, to some scholars. Religion is as powerful as it is politics; the only difference is that politicians have the control of the dissemination of news, reports, and critical and real threats. The people will be exposed to what governments are allowing them to know. This is not a matter of democracy, republic, dictartorship, or anarchy. This is a matter of a rusty, nasty, and controlled political agenda that acts like a virus in all societies. However, religion is blantly and straightforward. We, Americans are the enemy of Islam. The world population is changing and nations around the world are experiencing Muslim growth, and so is the threat. Radical Islam is committed to erradicate all of those that are not Muslims, period.
The point is made. Can we adopt a diplomatic approach to prevent the enemy from killing us? I think, this question needs to be answered by Barack Hussein Obama, the first president of Muslim roots. The threat of weapons of mass destruction still latent while Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, and North Korea are still hosting terrorists to attack our freedom.
Usually the wrong hands are correlated with the wrong brains and any adversary to Western culture is a potential threat. A national nascent policy that addresses the threat of weapons of mass destruction does not help much either. How do our enemies see this new phase in our national security system? Very tentative.
The threat of Iran, North Korea, China, India, Yemen, Afghanistan, and similar nations is vivid. The chaotic and uncontrollable border security between the American and Mexican lines adds wood to the terrorism fire. The familiarization, commercial trading, and establishment of mutual relations between North Korea, Iran, and Venezuela, descentralizes the threat to the southern part of the hemisphere making it a broad and massive threat to our resources. The spread of the threat will go as far as we allow it to go. The threat is against us and we must act promptly, firmly, and effectively.
No control and/or elimination of the threat will be ever successful with diplomacy. We continue experimenting with diplomacy because our nature takes over. We need to shift to the execution of strategies that abolishes the threat from its roots. If this means to put to sleep every terrorist caught, this is exactly what is going to bring victory. No other plan will be victorious, no other alternative will defeat terrorism, no diplomacy has ever been effective against terrorism, and no mercy shall be impossed when dealing with the threat of radical Islam.
The Livermore Study Group has warned us of the need of multilayered defense from detection and prevention to reversal and response to counterrest the threat of weapons of mass destruction. Taking in consideration that the study was done 14 years ago as a proactive approach after the 1993 coward terrorist attack to the World Trade Center in New York City, and the 1995 henious terrorist attack to the Alfred Murray federal building in Oklahoma City, the threat of terrorism has been given attention but not the necessary one.
In 2001, the conclusion of an unfinished business was clear after the complete destruction of the world economic icon, the World Trade Center. World report footage has shown Islamic celebrations around the world for what for us were tears, for them were joyful parties.
The Livermore Study Group could not predict that a WMD by the denomination of "aircraft" was possible or tentatively useful for the radicals that died in the name of their God. No further intelligence study has proposed that dying in the name of God is considered a threat to our society. Religion and politics does not mix, to some scholars. Religion is as powerful as it is politics; the only difference is that politicians have the control of the dissemination of news, reports, and critical and real threats. The people will be exposed to what governments are allowing them to know. This is not a matter of democracy, republic, dictartorship, or anarchy. This is a matter of a rusty, nasty, and controlled political agenda that acts like a virus in all societies. However, religion is blantly and straightforward. We, Americans are the enemy of Islam. The world population is changing and nations around the world are experiencing Muslim growth, and so is the threat. Radical Islam is committed to erradicate all of those that are not Muslims, period.
The point is made. Can we adopt a diplomatic approach to prevent the enemy from killing us? I think, this question needs to be answered by Barack Hussein Obama, the first president of Muslim roots. The threat of weapons of mass destruction still latent while Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, and North Korea are still hosting terrorists to attack our freedom.
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
History of Ignorance: What America is Good at.
By unanumous decision a city commision panel approved the project of building a mosque nearby ground zero in New York City.
Great wars have been won due to the use of tactical psychological operations, and this may be the one tactic to the Muslim world to enter deep in the heart of democracy to disseminate hate, and jihad to the United States.
The mosque, which is similar to say "house of terror," cannot be built nearby, nor far away in our own soil. Our history of tolerance, compassion, and ignorance is allowing for this to happen.
Besides the fact that this project is a direct spit in the tombs of the martyrs and victims of the suicidal, coward, and henious terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, it also represents our weakness, and empathy with the evil forces of aversion that are eliminating worldwide the parameters of democracy.
France, England, and Canada to name a few nations, have ben invaded by the leprosy of Islam as a time-bomb ready to explode. They are just sleepers.
The Department of Homeland Security forgot to include entities such as the US Department of Labor, and US Department of Education, to name a few to regulate, control, identify, and eliminate sources of Islamic context oriented to the dissemination of terrorist interests throughout the channels of our freedom.
Building a house of terror nearby ground zero is a total disrespect that politicians still don't get it . The ignorant politicians excuse themselves by indicating that in America we have the right of freedom of religion and freedom of assembly. The house of terror will be pretty soon packed with anti-American law, anti-American freedom, and everything they can in the name of the Almighty.
Wake up America!! You are the only 100% responsible party in this huge, exhaust, and terrible decision maker. America does not need mosques, it needs schools. America does not need jihad, it needs freedom.
Do not be ignorant of what is happening in your own house,
Be firm and never let the excrement of mankind, radical Islam, be near you at anytime.
Great wars have been won due to the use of tactical psychological operations, and this may be the one tactic to the Muslim world to enter deep in the heart of democracy to disseminate hate, and jihad to the United States.
The mosque, which is similar to say "house of terror," cannot be built nearby, nor far away in our own soil. Our history of tolerance, compassion, and ignorance is allowing for this to happen.
Besides the fact that this project is a direct spit in the tombs of the martyrs and victims of the suicidal, coward, and henious terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, it also represents our weakness, and empathy with the evil forces of aversion that are eliminating worldwide the parameters of democracy.
France, England, and Canada to name a few nations, have ben invaded by the leprosy of Islam as a time-bomb ready to explode. They are just sleepers.
The Department of Homeland Security forgot to include entities such as the US Department of Labor, and US Department of Education, to name a few to regulate, control, identify, and eliminate sources of Islamic context oriented to the dissemination of terrorist interests throughout the channels of our freedom.
Building a house of terror nearby ground zero is a total disrespect that politicians still don't get it . The ignorant politicians excuse themselves by indicating that in America we have the right of freedom of religion and freedom of assembly. The house of terror will be pretty soon packed with anti-American law, anti-American freedom, and everything they can in the name of the Almighty.
Wake up America!! You are the only 100% responsible party in this huge, exhaust, and terrible decision maker. America does not need mosques, it needs schools. America does not need jihad, it needs freedom.
Do not be ignorant of what is happening in your own house,
Be firm and never let the excrement of mankind, radical Islam, be near you at anytime.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
A Desperate Call to Fight Terrorism in the World
Terrorism has been defined as an evil force aimed to destroy democracy, beliefs, and ways of life by groups totally infected with fanatic passion for accomplishing their goals by impossing them no matter what. Currently, the United States is fighting a war against terrorism, and after 4,000 dead soldiers, we still not able to find the horse's rein to stabilize and control the Al Q'aeda's forces.
Somehow, the war in Iraq was labeled a war against terrorism, a necessary film but with the wrong actors. What about transferring the war to Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, and Sudan? Why do we still negotiating with the PLO, an authentic terrorist organization that supports the total erradication of the State of Israel? Why the American government seems to ignore the rethorics of Ismail Haniyeh, leader of Hamas, another authentic terrorist organization?
If we are going to fight a war against terrorism, we must focus on the real perpetrartors of terror. We must aim our deadliest weapons and sabers to the heart of Hizbollahs, Hamas, Al Q'aeda, and PLO. There should not be room for negotiations nor diplomatic reunions. We need to understand that we cannot continue to be naive and think that negotiations will resolve the problems and the threats of terrorism. Terrorists are the leprosy of humanity that need to be erradicated from its roots immediately.
Jihad has been called, the Jewish people has been threatened and killed, the courageous men and women of the IDF defend the soil and occupied settlements to protect the safety and peace of their people.
Muslims are good people, as Catholics, Jews, Protestants, Hindus, etc. But there are also bad Catholics, bad Protestants, and bad Muslims. Whoever disrupts peace, attacks innocent people, committs henious crimes, and joys himself with the killing of who he or she considers enemies, should be executed.
Terrorism is not a sickness that can be treated with some dosis of medicine day by day until is cured. Terrorism is a sickness that needs to be treated with surgery to remove the malign molecules immediately. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is one of those molecules.
No more negotiations with the PLO, no more concessions to Hizbollahs and Hamas, and lets stop the henious crimes committed against the people of Israel, their sovereignty, their pride, their nation, their spirit, and their democracy. Lets start the surgery immediately!
(Original article posted on the Jewish newspaper website IsraPost, by Victor Guembes, 08/12/2007)
Somehow, the war in Iraq was labeled a war against terrorism, a necessary film but with the wrong actors. What about transferring the war to Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, and Sudan? Why do we still negotiating with the PLO, an authentic terrorist organization that supports the total erradication of the State of Israel? Why the American government seems to ignore the rethorics of Ismail Haniyeh, leader of Hamas, another authentic terrorist organization?
If we are going to fight a war against terrorism, we must focus on the real perpetrartors of terror. We must aim our deadliest weapons and sabers to the heart of Hizbollahs, Hamas, Al Q'aeda, and PLO. There should not be room for negotiations nor diplomatic reunions. We need to understand that we cannot continue to be naive and think that negotiations will resolve the problems and the threats of terrorism. Terrorists are the leprosy of humanity that need to be erradicated from its roots immediately.
Jihad has been called, the Jewish people has been threatened and killed, the courageous men and women of the IDF defend the soil and occupied settlements to protect the safety and peace of their people.
Muslims are good people, as Catholics, Jews, Protestants, Hindus, etc. But there are also bad Catholics, bad Protestants, and bad Muslims. Whoever disrupts peace, attacks innocent people, committs henious crimes, and joys himself with the killing of who he or she considers enemies, should be executed.
Terrorism is not a sickness that can be treated with some dosis of medicine day by day until is cured. Terrorism is a sickness that needs to be treated with surgery to remove the malign molecules immediately. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is one of those molecules.
No more negotiations with the PLO, no more concessions to Hizbollahs and Hamas, and lets stop the henious crimes committed against the people of Israel, their sovereignty, their pride, their nation, their spirit, and their democracy. Lets start the surgery immediately!
(Original article posted on the Jewish newspaper website IsraPost, by Victor Guembes, 08/12/2007)
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Recommended Reading Material About Terrorism
The United States of America has always been considered a
super power in the world. Its strong economic structure, its
super power in the world. Its strong economic structure, its
Constitutional rights, the beauty to live in freedom, and the
support and protection from a democratic federal government,
invited immigrants from all nations to be part of this great nation.
The Lion roared strongly for centuries but something has been damaging its internal organs, something that works quietly like cancer: Terrorism.
Victor Guembes, CHS, IAC, a counterterrorism and security expert
educates the readers with the basics of this malign and evil disease
from definitions, profile of a terrorist, and human deviance behavior, to the lands of the Middle East, and America's failures on immigration laws, and a vast areas of vulnerabilities that have threatened, still threatening, and will keep our nation in jeopardy under the evil forces of aversion that radical Islam is capable of.
Written in chapters, over 130 pages, and clear concepts combined with the Author's opinions, The Lion's Cancer is an excellent reading option to understand why the United States of America is at war. This book is sold exclusively at http://www.lulu.com/.
From 2004-2007, Victor Guembes worked as a Corporate Security Manager for a multinational industrial company in areas of access control, surveillance, investigations, undercover operations, security audit and survey, mine security and safety, and maritime security. He assisted in the developing and implementation of security policies to the FSO at the ports of Essex (NJ), Chesapeakee (VA), and Tampa (FL). The Port was written as a novel identifying any port, especially Tampa Port as a vulnerable point for the next terrorist attack.
The terrorists plan for the attack takes place in several parts of the globe to include the initiation phase in Afghanistan, the training phase in Iran, the first surveillance and testing operations in Tampa, FL, the regrouping phase in Afghanistan, and the final phase, which brings the execution plan. The triumph was credited to the Kaljatahl terrorist group, with strong ties to Al Q'aeda and other radical Islam organizations. This book is sold exclusively at www.lulu.com, www.amazon.com, and www.barnesandnoble.com.
Also available in any book store by special order. Refer to ISBN number 978-0-578-00546-1.
Also available in any book store by special order. Refer to ISBN number 978-0-578-00546-1.
America and the USA Patriot Act
The United States of America was attacked and war has been declared against our nation, our principles, our way of life, our democracy, our beliefs, our history, and our future. Most Americans may think it started with the coward and evil attacks of September 11, 2001. In fact terrorism attacks have been growing since the 70's but the main event that caught our attention toward a new phenomen was the Hizbollah attack to the Marine compound in Beirut in 1983. Between 1983 and 2001, nothing was done to prepare in the fight against terrorism. It did happen in our soil. It didn't affect Americans. And the President of the United States back then, Ronald Reagan, already apologized to the military and the family members.
As a nation of complacency, little by little we started stabbing our own nation by doing exactly what we are good at, nothing.
With the poisoned dart through the heart after the destruction of the World Trade Center in New York, America developed and implemented a powerful tool to intercept and obstruct terrorism, the US Patriot Act. Although, this act generated protest from civil rights organizations to include the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the advantages and disadvantages of it are aspects we must deal with it while fighting the war against terrorism.
Tuesday, September 11, 2001, dawned temperate and nearly cloudless in the eastern United States. Millions of men and women readied themselves for work. Some made their way to the Twin Towers in New York City. Others went to the Pentagon in Virginia. In Sarasota, Florida, President George W. Bush went for an early morning run. For those heading to an airport, weather conditions could not have been better for a safe and pleasant journey. Among the travelers was Mohamed Atta and Abdul Aziz al Omari, who arrived at the airport in Portland, Maine (The 9/11 Commission Report).
This was the end of the old America and the beiginning of the new America. Because of the "We have some planes" expression by Mohamed Atta, Americans can say "We have the USA Patriot Act." While the Muslim community feels targeted by the Act, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) claims that essential American freedoms are at risk, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) rejects it because its anti-constitutional elements, the development and implementation of the US Patriot Act is the best legal tool ever created to identify, investigate and counterattack individuals and organizations involved in acts of terrorism, directly or indirectly, against the sovereignty of this great nation, our nation, the United States of America.
It is obvious that the Act has generated controversy among Americans and definitely among foreign individuals living in our communities, especially the Muslim community.
The coward attacks on September 11, 2001 changed our way we do certain things, the way we make new sense for security measures, and the way the world pays attention to the catastrophic consequences of a terrorist attack. This has to be the wake up call for all American citizens to realize the danger and reality of radical Islamism as the vivid and evil force committed to destroy and erradicate anything or anybody that does not meet,or is not compatible, or is not of Islamic beliefs.
This commitment is written in the holy book, the Qur'an. It advises, "Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelive in Allah. Make a holy war.......When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any of these, you also accept it and withold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to accept Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them......If the refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya (the tax on non-Muslims especified in Qur'an 9:29). If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them (Sahih Muslim 4294)."
President Bush made it clear during his speech on November 6, 2001: "You're either with us or against us in the fight against terrorism," while looking for international support to bring terrorist organizations down around the world just two weeks after the USA Patriot Act entered into effect. The following are some of the advantages and disadvantages of the Act:
Advantages:
a) Enables law enforcement agencies and intelligence personnel to share information that is needed to connect the dots and disrupt potential terror and criminal activity before they can carry out their plots.
b) Enables US Customs and Border Protection to screen international visitors and determine whether an apprehended alien presents a threat to security or public safety.
c) US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) seeks to deny criminal organizations accessto financial systems that terrorists and other criminal organizations may exploit in rising, moving, and storing illicit funds.
Disadvantages:
a) It provides sweeping powers to government agencies to monitor the personal habits of not only those that have been identified as suspected terrorists, but anyone residing in the United States as well as US citizens residing abroad.
b) It allows the arrest and imprisonment of suspected terrorists without traditional legal protections for often unknown reasons.
c) It has been compared to the Sedition Act of 1918 and even the Reichstag Fire Decree and Enabling Act, which ultimately gave Adolf Hitler the opportunity to seize Germany.
Michelle Ricardson, a Legislation Consultant for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) commented: "Most Americans than expected would end up in government database. I think people are generally unhappy about that." And Nadira Al-Khalili, National Legal Council of the CAIR organization commented: "The Obama administration should review the FBI surveillance guidelines and bring them into comformity with the Constitution and with the cherised American values of religious freedom and respect for civil liberties." In my opinion, a Reichstag-alike decree should ban and prosecute those who in times of war against terrorism, seduce the masses by disseminating discomfort, opposition, and promote disloyalty against our government and pretend to advocate for those who have hurt us the most, radical Islam.
In conclusion, although the Muslim community feels targeted by the USA Patriot Act, the ACLU claims that essential American freedoms are at risk, and the CAIR rejects it because its anti-Constitutional elements, the Act provides the power needed to interfere and obstruct acts of terrorism against this nation, our nation, the United States of America.
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Protecting America Against Radical Islam
After the September 11, 2001 coward terrorist attacks, the United States has learned that the threat of terrorism is something we must take seriously. There is no other way to take it.
President George W. Bush declared and announced the War on Terrorism, a military event that is going for its nineth year and we still haven't make any substantial progress to secure our soverignty and destiny.
Radical Islam has declared War to America, the destruction of the state of Israel, the execution of every Jew in the world, and the destruction of every nation and individual that does not follow Islam, in an effort to control the world. Their commitment is serious and has a legal, moral, and religious foundation. They have a declared war in place.
By the Constitution of the United States, the Congress is the only authority to declare war. We are just fighting President George W. Bush's war. What will it take the American Congress to declare war and against what country? Will we declare war to Iran? What about Afghanistan?
While no concise answer, it seems that we are just declaring war to terrorism as a whole. We have identified a very difficult target with little or no knowledge of what terrorism really is.
By nature, we are a nation of complacency and believe in super-powers and inmunity. We cried our losses until the end of 2001; we forgot about the terrorist incidents and what radical Islam is capable of, and we have left the battle to our men and women of the Armed Forces. We have abandoned them as we did in Vietnam fighting an unknown enemy that does not wear uniform but can cut your guts and throat with the same knife they eat, as we did in Vietnam fighting in a terrain we were never exposed to, the jungle.
Nine years later of the so-called War on Terrorism and Osama Bin Laden still at large and the captured terrorists that have been prosecuted in the United States have enjoyed the protection any delinquent is given it. We are treating a delinquent and a terrorist as similar bad apples.
Let's don't forget that terrorists retreat to plan and attack again. Let's not confuse that the "silence" period is because we are defeating terrorism, it is just a matter of time until radical Islam stab us in the heart one more time.
American citizens need to get together and help in the fight or War on Terrorism, we do not need weapons, we need education, commitment, being alert, observe, report, follow up, and defeat terrorism utilizing every grassroot organization aiming towards the same objective: Protect America from Radical Islam, and secure our FREEDOM.
President George W. Bush declared and announced the War on Terrorism, a military event that is going for its nineth year and we still haven't make any substantial progress to secure our soverignty and destiny.
Radical Islam has declared War to America, the destruction of the state of Israel, the execution of every Jew in the world, and the destruction of every nation and individual that does not follow Islam, in an effort to control the world. Their commitment is serious and has a legal, moral, and religious foundation. They have a declared war in place.
By the Constitution of the United States, the Congress is the only authority to declare war. We are just fighting President George W. Bush's war. What will it take the American Congress to declare war and against what country? Will we declare war to Iran? What about Afghanistan?
While no concise answer, it seems that we are just declaring war to terrorism as a whole. We have identified a very difficult target with little or no knowledge of what terrorism really is.
By nature, we are a nation of complacency and believe in super-powers and inmunity. We cried our losses until the end of 2001; we forgot about the terrorist incidents and what radical Islam is capable of, and we have left the battle to our men and women of the Armed Forces. We have abandoned them as we did in Vietnam fighting an unknown enemy that does not wear uniform but can cut your guts and throat with the same knife they eat, as we did in Vietnam fighting in a terrain we were never exposed to, the jungle.
Nine years later of the so-called War on Terrorism and Osama Bin Laden still at large and the captured terrorists that have been prosecuted in the United States have enjoyed the protection any delinquent is given it. We are treating a delinquent and a terrorist as similar bad apples.
Let's don't forget that terrorists retreat to plan and attack again. Let's not confuse that the "silence" period is because we are defeating terrorism, it is just a matter of time until radical Islam stab us in the heart one more time.
American citizens need to get together and help in the fight or War on Terrorism, we do not need weapons, we need education, commitment, being alert, observe, report, follow up, and defeat terrorism utilizing every grassroot organization aiming towards the same objective: Protect America from Radical Islam, and secure our FREEDOM.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)