Broken Trust: The Loss of Leadership

Despite the anemic economic growth in the nation, the presumably popularity of President Barack Hussein Obama over presidential candidate Mitt Romney, and the recently lower percentage of unemployment divulged by the current administration, there is something that has affected the security, sovereignty, and destiny of our nation, and the support we traditionally have shown to our allies, among them Israel.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sent a message to all American voters, to think and elect the right president, who is aware of the threat of global terrorism, and especially a president who is firm and has the conviction to draw the line on tolerance with the regime of Iran.  President Barack Hussein Obama's promises to stand by Israel is nothing but a broken record all voters must discard.  The imminent and continuous threat of Ahmadenejad‘s regime toward Israel is not only crossing the lines, spitting over United Nations inspectors, but also defeating the leadership of the American president.  The United States is losing control in the Middle East and Africa as protests growth by the minute in Syria, Yemen, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Jordan, Iran, Iraq, Algeria, and Afghanistan feeding anti-Western sentiments and defeating the physical security of American embassies and consulates around the world.  The loss of Ambassador Christopher Stevens was a premeditated terrorist attack; however, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton not only thinks it was not a premeditated attack but questions how this can happened in a nation the United States helped to removed Muammar Qadhafi from power. It is not a complex case; the current administration either fails to accept the reality, or it simply still is loss in matters of national security and tries to feed the American public with wrongful and deliberated inaccurate information.  Libyan President Mohamed El-Magariaf said he is convinced the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi was premeditated, as the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations said that the protests near the consulate began spontaneously, but were later hijacked by armed extremists.  It seems that the current administration intelligence community needs to be reminded of the famous Curve of Conflict and analyze it better before Secretary of State launched a ridiculous message to the nation.  The lack of proper security, especially during the anniversary of September 11, and the belief that Libya is now a friendly nation of the United States is the clear reflection of a naïve and typical defective security system.  We have seen this approach before; we thought Pakistan was a fiercely allied and we forgot that the masterminded of the first attack to the World Trade Center, Ramsey Yousef seek shelter in Pakistan, and Islamabad was the protective shelter to Osama Bin Laden.  This inability to execute proper and firm decisions, and strategies toward the threat of global terrorism has broken the trust of having this administration in charge of affairs not well known to them.  On the other hand, the broken trust affects America’s allies, especially Israel.  The Obama administration simply sends the message that the foreign policy and development of current violent events in the Middle East disregards national security as the security of our allies.  The continuous position of this administration that everything that is currently happening in the region is spontaneous is mere irresponsibility and complete disregard, to the point that it seems there is a hidden sympathetic feeling with jihad. 

The next president must step firm and draw the line of tolerance with Iran immediately after taking charge of the Oval Office.  If the Obama strategy is to stay away from this approach and to suggest Israel to attack Iran first so it does not look that the United States started to stir the pot of war, he is absolutely wrong and it only reflects his lack of leadership once again, and helps to a fastest fading of trust from Israel to the United States.  If Israel attacks Iran first, this will be the seal to the ignorance, miscalculation, and premeditated criminal action from this administration.  In the next elections, America needs a leader, a true American.        

Death and Life: The Difference between the Middle East and the West

In a capitalistic and democratic country, nothing can be better set as it is in the United States of America. Governments, states, societies, organizations, liberties, freedoms, free commerce, and respect for human life also characterizes the north- American nation. The citizens, by history and by default, have embraced a way of life totally different from other nations around the world, and it has coined democracy and freedoms as the foundation of its history and life-style, seeing life as a precious and indisputable gift from the heavens. Thoughts contrary to these characteristics are difficult to understand or even to accept to fulfill a healthy and safe way of living. Osama bin Laden knew what is important for all American citizens. He understood and was convinced that the suppression of any freedom would collapse the structure of democracy, its economy, and its socio-political aspect as a nation. He had the best ally to actually present a very strong army of soldiers to fight America and its allies, and to regroup and counterattack at any given time, something that the United States does not venerate: Death.

I will associate death with the Middle East and life with the United States. Bin Laden stated: “We love death. The US loves life. That is the difference between us two.” This is the starting point of the best strategy of war and the West has to pay attention to the seriousness of radicalism, and has to understand that this is an irreversible philosophy: Radicalism and death versus democracy and life. The average American citizen does not know or cannot explain why radical Muslims hate the United States of America; neither can explain why they attacked the World Trade Center and why terrorist groups continue to recruit to attack Americans. The United States has spent over $1.3 trillion on the fight against terrorism, almost quadruple of expenses during World War I and sacrificed the lives of 6,000 soldiers and the count continues (Vu, 2011). Thousands of family members mourn their combatants and tears seem to never stop. The American soldier does everything possible to avoid death; the radical fighter does everything possible to die for the cause. This is a substantial difference that the average person does not comprehend. America protects the freedom of religion and promotes good relations among all members; it is in the form of one nation and many religions. The Muslim world protects Islam and promotes it across the globe; it is in the form of one religion and many nations.
Both approaches collide when one side supports the State of Israel and the other does not recognize it as State and is committed to its total destruction as well as the annihilation of the Jewish people. The Muslim world sees the United States as their main enemy due to the support to Israel.
Hopefully the next White House administration will not only recognize Iran, Syria, Palestine, and Afghanistan as the latent source of terrorism against the world, and directly against the State of Israel, but to take a decisive, strong, and effective approach toward these states that sponsor terrorism.

Iranian Nuclear Program: The Clock is Ticking

Diplomatic talks seem to enter a stalling period we just hate to watch and experience. The United Nations Security Council, as well as President Barack Hussein Obama has postponed diplomatic conversations and the possibility to reach an agreement with Iran until the last week of May. In the meantime, Iran continues to do what the country knows best, which is the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction through their customized nuclear program, under the fake curtain of energy purposes, while the world knows it is of increasing its nuclear capabilities to dominate the region, and be a threat to the world. Prime Minister Netanyahu does not believe that the rearrangement of dates for the political talks serves any purposes other than allowing Iran to hold a free-pass to continue their offensive program.
As it is common of the current administration, President Barak Hussein Obama said during his visit last week in Cartagena, Colombia, that he expects Iran to come to the table of negotiations in good faith. History is still witnessing expectations from world leaders but strict and immediate actions. While Iran is running world leaders are crawling to the negotiation table hoping that Iran can easily agree on disarmament or face economic sanctions. Some leaders, like Netanyahu, believe that a second Holocaust is not a dream-event if Iran is freely allowed to continue its evil reproduction of uranium embraced in a sadistic, everlasting hate toward Israel. In September 2005, Dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad professed his desire to pursue Iran’s nuclear technology program, which he sustained as peaceful purposes and for energy use. He also condemned the United States for proliferating weapons of mass destruction and for elaborating a climate of intimidation and injustice. Maybe President Barak Hussein Obama needs to remember that the Iranian leader will stick with the nuclear program as a response to any intention to impose different political views on the Iranian people. The threat is imminent in the region and Israel continues exposed to such a terrible possibility of a new wave of destruction and isolation. Iran does not recognizes Israel as an independent legal state; it just doesn’t happen, which makes the all nuclear program a ticking bomb that needs to be stopped immediately and not at the end of May, which hours and days ahead provides a cushion to the Iranian government to continue their evil development of nuclear capabilities. The celebration of Yom Hashoah (Holocaust Remembrance Day) on July 19 is a day of prayer, and it should be a day of condemnation for the horrific events that took place, and it should also be a day to stand by Israel and stop all those, who attempt against their sovereignty and peace. Iran needs to be stopped now.

Preparation for War: Israel has it all

The tension in the Middle East still is vivid and unpredictable, especially in the oil shipping lanes of the Gulf, which should a confrontation sparks, mainly Iran, Israel, and the United States will hold military confrontations.
Israel has it all. One of the best armies in the world, excellent technological powers, trusted weaponry, above average experience in military strategy, superb counterintelligence capabilities, great knowledge of its worse enemies’ vulnerabilities, the positive winning spirit of a cougar, and the indisputable conviction to preserve peace at any cost possible. To add more, the United States of America stands by its side to provide all needed support. Threats coming from Teheran in regard to shutting down the Strait of Hormuz are simply kitty cries from the corrupt, abusive, and coward regime of Ahmedinejed. However, the continuous growth in nuclear capability with undoubtedly military purpose is of concern not only to the region but to the Western hemisphere as well.
Naval maneuvers in the region by the Iranian regime show the aggressive shout to the world by a putrefactive government that is underestimating the power of Israel. The Islamic regime is setting the arena for war, and it is playing with fire without knowing how to extinguish it. It is not a common fire; it is Israel, a nation tired of living in fear and constant threat coming from Islamic regimes. Preparations for war are over. Israel is ready but should hold on one more time.
Hold it because the American president hasn’t showed support for Israel yet. No press conference has been identified with an appearance of the most powerful man on earth; the problem is that the position of president of the United States is powerful not the man who is a mere tenant in the White House. Barack Hussein Obama has not publicly threatened to retaliate with military force over the Iranian advance in nuclear programs. It is essential to understand the true danger a nuclear armed Iran would pose to the United States’ interests in the Middle East and beyond. It is time for a well meticulous and micromanaged military strike onto Iranian nuclear huts resembling the rapid power of a lightning bolt to destroy, and paralyze all capabilities of enrichment in the Islamic territory. Iran continues expelling all inspectors from its nuclear establishments while continuing enriching its stockpiles of uranium, and gradually reaching the moment of installing centrifuges at its uranium enrichment facility in Qom.
The moment is tense in the region. Israel has it all to accomplish a successful military intervention in Iran; however, a United States with a poor leader in the White House is like a double threat to the entire strategy of war.

The Syrian Threat

The Syrian government cannot rest in blaming the current chaotic situation in the hands of foreign countries that want the regime of Bashar al-Assad down. The punishment from the government against their own citizens is not an unknown issue. In March 2011, a group of students who protested against the regime and set some graffiti were cruelty tortured, as a massive wave of protest did not get deterred by the government actions. Maybe it is time for a radical change and it is time for the Assads to abandon the country as soon as possible.
Thousands of soldiers have already defected and began launching attacks against government installations and formed several cells united with civilians to show their support for new reforms in the country. In December 2011, the United Nations called the situation of Syria at the verge of civil war.
The conflict between the government and the people is not an easy rivalry. It calls for confrontations with several ethnic divisions. The people from the government and elite members of society belong to the Alawite sect, which is a minority when compared with the Sunni population. Despite this chaotic situation, Syria continues to be a major threat to Israel; daily confusion on the streets, people abandoning their homes seeking for shelter, and women and children targeted by their own regime only shows the coldness and sanguinary thirst of a dictatorship also committed to attack Israel.
In 2008, a Syrian government delegation visited Moscow seeking a variety of new weapons systems that Israel considers threatening. Syria focuses on anti-aerial missiles is a
preparation to repel any attack from the Golan Heights; however, Israel needs to reinforce the border with Syrian by stationing long range missiles in the mountains without ignoring the Lebanese border as well for a possible wave of immigrants seeking shelter outside Syria.
Let’s not forget the military pact between Iran and Syria in the event Israel and the United States make any movement in the region. In 2005, the evil counsel of Mamoud Ahmadinejed had a pact with military officials from Syria to allow Iranian weapons in their territory in order to confront the Israeli-America threat in the region. Syria harbors representatives of several Palestinian terrorist organizations to include Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. There is no doubt that Syria also contributes to the support of Iranian funded terrorist organization Hezbollah. Israel has reasonable believes that Syria is a threat; the northern country of Lebanon was under Syrian control for more than 30 years and supported all the way Hezbollah training facilities as a proxy to fight Israel.
Israel emphasized that its interest in peace and negotiations with Syrian authorities faded when impacted by the continuous support to terrorist organizations in Damascus. Syria continues to be part of the axis of evil and a force that encourages, support, and delivers terror in the Middle East. Ambassador Robert Ford left the country upon closing of the Unites States Embassy in Damascus; the tension is palpable and deserves monitoring round the clock. The people of Syria need the support from outside nations; What is the Obama administration doing for the people of Syria besides talking? Both Assad and Obama are at the end of their rope. The security of Israel cannot be compromised by the incompetence of Muslim rooted Barack Hussein Obama.

Running out of Time to Prevent War

After 70-years of the Japanese military strike to Pearl Harbor, which forced the United States to enter World War II the provocation for military confrontations have considered deep analysis of the adversaries through intense military intelligence to avoid an embarrassed counterattack like the one experienced in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Developing contingency plans in the United States against the threat of terrorism also should consider massive attacks like Pearl Harbor with the difference of fragmentation in its nature. The threat of international terrorism does not point a one specific target but multiple ones capable to cripple the economy for many years to come.
Iran has been preparing for many years in developing nuclear weapons, nuclear capabilities, and has growth rapidly by enriching uranium and many other weapons of mass destruction. The Islamic government continues informing the world that this growth in technology and research is for medical purposes as well as other nonlethal objectives. Following the steps of Mammoud Amadenejed is the dictator Hugo Chavez, who has transformed Venezuela in an authorized Iranian field for negotiations and possible contingency plans in the event of an American attack to the Middle East nation. No doubt Hezbollah training camps may be part of a cancerous spread of the Islamic threat.
In 2010, Israel began the distribution of millions of protection kits against biochemical warfare and the construction of a new massive public bomb shelter in Tel Aviv, and the constant brainwashing of the Iranian masses by religious eminences to respond if Israel attacks Teheran until it is completely wiped -out of the map, are some of the reasons the smell of war is almost inevitable.
Unfortunately, it is not very clear that the Obama administration stands behind the State of Israel as previous presidents had. There is no true conviction to protect and respect Jerusalem as the Israeli capital. There is a lousy interest to stand firm during the current threats from Iran against the State of Israel and the Western hemisphere. If war is inevitable, fragmented, and massive attacks to the United States would be part of the Islamic strategy. The terrorist cells are already within American institutions, and they have entered the nation through the vast unprotected southern border. Mexican drug lords and terrorists have established a relationship creating a force America poorly recognizes: Narco-terrorism.
The threat of shutting down the Strait of Hormuz by the Islamic regime and the death sentence imposed to an Iranian-American citizen is adding wood to the fire of an imminent war ready to happen. The State of Israel should not and cannot defeat the Islamic regime by itself; if we do not stand by it, we may be condemned to repeat multiple Pearl Harbor like attacks in our own soil. If a war evolves it would not be a conventional war, although it may start like one, it may not end as such.
The threat of radical Islam is closing the alternatives we have to negotiate a better outcome. The mediation of the Arab League in Syria did not receive any positive commitment and cooperation from the Assad’s regime. The new proposed legislation to ban any business dealings with Bank Markazi, which conducts the majority of Iran’s oil sales, and the $30 billion agreement to sell advanced fighter aircrafts to Saudi Arabia to counter Iranian power are heating up the tensions in the region.
This is the moment to stand firm, united, and decisive against the threat of radical Islam in the world. This is the moment of truth to prove we care about the State of Israel and our allies against the war on terrorism. This is the time in history to defeat radical Islam, even if military intervention is the only option.

The Nuclear Threat

Depending who you ask, the nation with the obvious nuclear threat will vary. Iranian officials sustain that their nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, aimed at generating energy for its growing population, and that it has the right to technology as other nations do. Dictator Ahmadenejad believes that Israel is the only country in the Middle Ease that actually has nuclear weapons, and refuses to submit to international inspections. Along with Israel, the United States also is a threat to the Middle East region in regard to nuclear power. However, the United States and Israel believe that Iran and North Korea are major threats in the proliferation of nuclear weapons due to the enormous increase in their capabilities to produce more.
A year before the coward attacks of September 11, 2001, Robert Walpole, a National Intelligence Officer for Strategic and Nuclear Programs made a statement in regard to the Iranian ballistic missile and weapons of mass destruction threat. He affirmed that the proliferation of ballistic missiles and WMD continues to evolve in the world, especially in Iran and North Korea, which becomes a threat to America’s interests abroad, the military forces, and its allies. An important remark was made during the speech given in front of the International Security, Proliferation and Federal Services Subcommittee of the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee that the threats faced in 2000 will increase by the year 2015. Such threat will grow by then and the sovereignty of the United States will depend on the evolving relations with foreign countries. Back then the eyes were aiming toward Iran and North Korea; now the threat also includes China, Russia, Pakistan, India, and Venezuela.
In 2003, on a visit to Teheran, International Atomic Energy Agency director Mohamed El Baradei announced the discovering that Iran was constructing a facility in Natanz to enrich uranium, which is a key element of advanced nuclear weapons; the plant was classified as “extremely advanced,” attempting to world peace and safety and violating the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (Calabresi, 2003). Why the Iranian regime needs massive weapons of mass destruction? Who is the threat to the regime? Ahmadinejad repeatedly demonizes the state of Israel and openly calls for its destruction at every opportunity. Isn’t then the State of Israel the main target? Even worse, he described Israel as a "fake regime" that "must be wiped off the map." Ahmadinejad and all head of regimes that support him call the extermination of six million Jews during World War II “a myth.” Should the United States have consideration with this cancerous regime that tries to divert the reality of history, speeding the process of nuclear capabilities and development of armament, harboring terrorists, supporting the terrorist organization Hezbollah, and stating that Palestinians are living a true holocaust?
The economic and financial deprivation from the United States against the Iranian regime must continue with intense pressure. Any nation that exercises financial transactions with the regime’s Central Bank shall face absolute and immediate economic shut down from the United States.

Iran: The Axis of Evil

Former President George W. Bush labeled Iran as “The Axis of Evil” for its continuous support to terrorist operations and training in the region. In 2000 Hezbollah flags flew in many Palestinian camps in the West Bank and Gaza and the imminent injection of hate and evil never stopped while in the hands of individuals connected to the Iranian regime. Although Hezbollah has gained tremendous political support and it is considered a political movement in the region, it cannot get rid of its common denominator of operations: Terrorism.
Iran is a major provider of training and supplies to anti-Israeli Palestinians to keep the provocation alive as well as the constant instigation for violence in the border of Israel and Lebanon. Hasan Nasrallah, the leader of the terrorist organization Hezbollah believes that Palestinians have the duty and responsibility to liberate Palestine just as Syria has the responsibility of liberating the Golan Heights. His support does not limit to spiritual feeding but to the mandate of hostility and violence against Israel.
Since the withdrawal of Israeli military from south Lebanon in May 24, 2000, Hezbollah has concentrated in Lebanese politics and themes to include corruption and the preservation of a resistance posture both in Lebanon and the Middle East. Such preservation of resistance and violence against Israel counted with the blessings of the Iranian rahbar or leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as part of the strategy of violence in the Israeli-Lebanese border; this is why Hezbollah develops direct relations with groups based in Lebanon, Palestine, and anywhere else.
Hezbollah’s position, with the blessing and support from Iran it is nothing else than a group of fanatics and terrorists committed to the destabilization of peace and harmony in the region and loyal followers to the mandate of any fatwa given by an ignorant spiritual leader focused on jihad. Hezbollah condemns all negotiations made with Israel by any nation around the world because it is considered that by doing so, nations are sealing the legitimacy of Israel, which attempts the creed of Hezbollah and Iran. It is very simple and clear, the ultimate objective is to destroy Israel and to liberate Palestine for the institution of an Islamic power in the region. The terrorist organization Hezbollah mainly reside in Lebanon but its spiritual bridge is connected to Iran’s Islamic spiritual leader Khamenei and it has always won increasing support among the local Shia. The permanent link between Iran and Hezbollah enhances the mission of the Axis that has no intentions for peace and understanding but evil, torment, and violence against the State of Israel.
In the eyes of a true American, anyone supporting Hezbollah is supporting a terrorist group and its acts of violence. Any government being indifferent to the sovereignty of the State of Israel is a supporter of the Axis of Evil, its agenda, and radicalism of its spiritual leaders.

Iran: The Primary Threat

Nearly thirty years after the 1979 revolution, Iran remains the State Department’s most active and latent state sponsor of terrorism. Iran’s firm and non-negotiable position to oppose Israel’s existence continues to enrich its label as the primary threat to the region and to world peace. The ambition for proliferation of nuclear capabilities that goes beyond energy use but to nuclear armament superiority is developing a sense of uncertainty in the region. The United States and its allies cannot shut down the conversations with the regime of Mahmoud Ahmedinejed in regard to pushing for internal inspections by independent sources with the authority and knowledge to evaluate the possible threat. The trick is to know how to talk to a regime that opposes feverously to the State of Israel in search for answers and cooperation through the inspection. No other American administration has made severe efforts to counter Iranian regional influence and weaken its government than President George W. Bush’s government. The period of the Obama administration has been the moment needed by the Iranian government to recoup the strength needed to remain as a global threat.
Immediate conversations must take place and effective responses should be the result of these conversations to ensure effective communication. The Islamic Republic is not on the verge of collapse and no internal revolution will take place. The nation is concise and strongly tied to Islamic principles that any abrupt political upheaval or military intervention could generate even worse results. Political strategists must identify if the Iranian policies and position is because the way the West behaves towards Iran or it simply is the way they do business with nations that support and stand by the State of Israel. After the identification of policy basics, the research of negotiation alternatives must take place with strong consideration of economic sanctions and strong, imminent, and consistent pressure to allow independent nuclear committee to evaluate every site, every corner, and every plan of the Iranian nuclear proliferation. Unfortunately, this will not be done during the current administration of Barak Hussein Obama, who has shown poor interest to this massive threat to the region, little concern about the future of the sovereignty of the State of Israel, and no interest or knowledge in regard to the continuous support from the Iranian government to terrorist organizations in the region.
The United Nations’ nuclear chief, Yukiya Amano has made public a report indicating that Iran is trying to develop nuclear technologies for arms, something that the government of Ahmedinejed has denied and labeled as political-motivated conspiracy with Washington. Members of the Iranian government and nuclear department have rejected any intervention of any organization directed to evaluate their nuclear potential and inventory. The Iranian people is not ready for a change as it was demonstrated in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, and Yemen; the Iranian government shut all talks when it comes to the State of Israel, its recognition, acceptance, and respect as a legally established nation; the Iranian government feeds constantly the evil veins of the terrorist organizations Hamas and Hezbollah, which are the cancer that spreads and threats the stabilization of nations and peace in the region.
In the eyes of the Iranian regime, there is a clear and real believe that Washington sought to install a pro-American puppet government in Iraq, protected by US troops for many years along with the dissemination of democratic and Western ideologies to be sympathetic to Israel and hostile to Iran, something that the Iranians also believe is happening with the government of Karzai in Afghanistan but they will not look back or sideways, they are committed to their evil doctrine that has the foundations of radical Islam, which translates into just one word: Terrorism.
Then, what are the options if all the doors for diplomatic talks are closed? What are the options to evaluate the proliferation of nuclear technologies in the country if the Iranian government does not welcome any organization to do so? What are the options if atomic research goes on between all five daily prayers? The answer is narrowing down to military intervention.
We must understand that military intervention needs to be the last resource after all other means have been exhausted and maybe double tried to avoid confrontation. If the last resource is to take place, an effective, lightning type raid to neutralize and deactivate nuclear power to be used must be the primary target and strategy of the entire special operation command center. Despite too many people may think it is a crazy idea to utilize military power against the Iranian regime, it is not as long as the preparation for such an attack is done properly.

Monitoring the Changes in the Red Zone

In 2011 the world has witnessed some unpredictable changes due to the collapse of regimes that for years have maintained their people under the hammer and oppression to deliberately put them under submission while the elite and selected families in power enjoyed lavish lifestyles for many decades.
As President John F. Kennedy said, “change is the law of life and those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future.” Hopefully this may alert the intelligence community and disregard any comfortable or misleading believe that the red zone will change for good. The monitoring must prevail in observance for the characteristics of each individual transition of power like in Tunisia, the most modern and European-like lifestyle nation in North Africa where the people could not take more abuse from the 23 years in power of President Ben Ali, in Egypt where President Hosni Mubarak had no other choice but to step down from the golden chair he sat for 30 years, in Libya where President Muamar Q’adhafi ruled for 42 years, and currently happening in Yemen where after 33 years of ruling tens of thousands of protesters denounced the promise of immunity from prosecution given to President Saleh while intending to transfer the power to his vice-president. We cannot miss the future and what the future has for the world peace without these cancerous leaders of oppression, abuse and dictatorship.
The influence of Islamic organizations is not going to stop to deter any Western model of government to interrupt the religious beliefs in the region. The American intelligence community must pay close attention and understand that the Islamic support to Al Q’aeda in the Arabian Peninsula will continue regardless of who is in power. Similar struggles from the people under a totalitarian regime is happening also in Syria, where the regime of Basahr al-Assad is under the microscope of the Arab League due to his lack of cooperation to allow observers in Damascus, the capital, to pull forces from different cities as the nation experiences economic sanctions at the same time. New faces will come and new abuses will persist; the new leaders will welcome international eyes to make them believe of a new start and fresh agenda for the well being of their masses, however the adherence to Islamic doctrine and mandates cannot change and will not change. The Western hemisphere will continue to be the target of attacks as well as its own interests around the world.
The American intelligence community should expect a very busy 2012 with the existence of a radical Islamic nation of Iran that will remain strong in defeating the United States, and that no agreements or productive relationships can be reached as long as we stand by the state of Israel. A new sleeping-lion observes our drowning in economic power, which China is ready to awake and intelligently step on our toes to crumble our financial institutions; North Korea will continue to express their ambition for nuclear superiority, while India will continue to generate income at a high speed rates. We always tend to believe that Pakistan was our allied and some politicians will continue to think the same even though some of them will never recognize they were wrong; Pakistan has always been a key piece in Al Q’aeda movements and production of terrorist in hidden training camps. Osama bin Laden found refuge in Pakistan and died in it. Immediate HUMINT and SIGINT operations are needed in the border with Mexico, which has lately become a funnel for people from the Middle East, something that never was known or never happened. Our borders are critical as well as our ports; strengthening the security in our ports of entry cannot be limited to closing only our doors but our windows as well. Border patrol in the southern part of the country is not near 100% effective and terrorist organizations are aware of it and they count with the support of drug cartels in the region.
The hammering and oppression of people by dictatorships may take a slightly turn in years to come as new governments make take a more modern approach to conduct business to their favor. However, the threat to the United States will persist until the end of days; we just need to be one step ahead and not be blinded by any upcoming changes or new peace treaties signed, which in the red zone mean nothing. Our borders need to be secured and training and quality of personnel should be first priority instead of creating new departments and filling it with bodies to presume effectiveness. Getting our law enforcement agencies involved in the collection of intelligence information from the streets in regard to suspicious elements or activities that may lead to terrorist business is imperative. Law enforcement are already on the streets of America, they just need to be trained in how to operate, observe, and collect certain data without making them a terrorism experts. We need to utilize our resources more effectively because the threat will affect America. We have a critical agenda to cover next year; we do not have the time to look at the past or present; we must concentrate in the future.

Iran: The Primary Threat

Nearly thirty years after the 1979 revolution, Iran remains the State Department’s most active and latent state sponsor of terrorism. Iran’s firm and non-negotiable position to oppose Israel’s existence continues to enrich its label as the primary threat to the region and to world peace. The ambition for proliferation of nuclear capabilities that goes beyond energy use but to nuclear armament superiority is developing a sense of uncertainty in the region. The United States and its allies cannot shut down the conversations with the regime of Mahmoud Ahmedinejed in regard to pushing for internal inspections by independent sources with the authority and knowledge to evaluate the possible threat. The trick is to know how to talk to a regime that opposes feverously to the State of Israel in search for answers and cooperation through the inspection. No other American administration has made severe efforts to counter Iranian regional influence and weaken its government than President George W. Bush’s government. The period of the Obama administration has been the moment needed by the Iranian government to recoup the strength needed to remain as a global threat.
Immediate conversations must take place and effective responses should be the result of these conversations to ensure effective communication. The Islamic Republic is not on the verge of collapse and no internal revolution will take place. The nation is concise and strongly tied to Islamic principles that any abrupt political upheaval or military intervention could generate even worse results. Political strategists must identify if the Iranian policies and position is because the way the West behaves towards Iran or it simply is the way they do business with nations that support and stand by the State of Israel. After the identification of policy basics, the research of negotiation alternatives must take place with strong consideration of economic sanctions and strong, imminent, and consistent pressure to allow independent nuclear committee to evaluate every site, every corner, and every plan of the Iranian nuclear proliferation. Unfortunately, this will not be done during the current administration of Barak Hussein Obama, who has shown poor interest to this massive threat to the region, little concern about the future of the sovereignty of the State of Israel, and no interest or knowledge in regard to the continuous support from the Iranian government to terrorist organizations in the region.
The United Nations’ nuclear chief, Yukiya Amano has made public a report indicating that Iran is trying to develop nuclear technologies for arms, something that the government of Ahmedinejed has denied and labeled as political-motivated conspiracy with Washington. Members of the Iranian government and nuclear department have rejected any intervention of any organization directed to evaluate their nuclear potential and inventory. The Iranian people is not ready for a change as it was demonstrated in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, and Yemen; the Iranian government shut all talks when it comes to the State of Israel, its recognition, acceptance, and respect as a legally established nation; the Iranian government feeds constantly the evil veins of the terrorist organizations Hamas and Hezbollah, which are the cancer that spreads and threats the stabilization of nations and peace in the region.
In the eyes of the Iranian regime, there is a clear and real believe that Washington sought to install a pro-American puppet government in Iraq, protected by US troops for many years along with the dissemination of democratic and Western ideologies to be sympathetic to Israel and hostile to Iran, something that the Iranians also believe is happening with the government of Karzai in Afghanistan but they will not look back or sideways, they are committed to their evil doctrine that has the foundations of radical Islam, which translates into just one word: Terrorism.
Then, what are the options if all the doors for diplomatic talks are closed? What are the options to evaluate the proliferation of nuclear technologies in the country if the Iranian government does not welcome any organization to do so? What are the options if atomic research goes on between all five daily prayers? The answer is narrowing down to military intervention.

Radical Islam behind Tensions in the Region

Although no official sources have declared this assertion, Radical Islam may be celebrating the disruption of peace in Egypt, and bringing the region to its everlasting melody of uprisings and violence. Since the victory of Hamas in 2006 in the Gaza Strip, strange things had to be taken place in the boundaries of Egypt and Israel beside the armament smuggling and secret tunnels, which has always been Israel’s main concern. The inadequate restriction and control of traffic between these two lands has been criticized by many scholars and the Israeli government. Thirty years of diplomacy and built relations between the United States and Egypt brought some peace in the region, at least between Egypt and Israel as a result of the acceptance and recognition of the Israeli State by the Arab nation of Egypt. Uncle Sam has injected billions of dollars per year to the Egyptian government and its military forces to preserve stability in the region. Multi-national forces in assignment as observers have also maintained an open eye from the Sinai to ensure peaceful living in the region. It seems that financial support from Washington blinded the American governments from the Carter administration to the Obama’s by feeding dollars in exchange for good relations with Israel. Let’s not forget that Egypt is an Arab nation and as such its population has exploded into an unbelievable uprising demanding the resignation of Hosni Mubarak. People on the streets are shouting for big changes, food, and attention to their needs and they are done in seeing their government with ties to the United States and both nations protection to the State of Israel. Very simple, Arab nations are meant for the destruction of the Israeli nation and prosecution of Jewish communities. What happened in November of 1977, when Egyptian President Anwar Sadat made a stunning trip to Jerusalem as result of the Carter administration efforts to negotiate with Israel is backfiring now to the region, and to the United States. The return of the Sinai Desert to Egypt was a disgrace to the 7,000 Jewish people whom resettled themselves someplace else as part of the peace agreement plus the injection of billions of dollars to Egypt to stay away from Jewish land and to stop participating in the Arab League to boycott Israel. Maybe this will be the same scenario we confronted during the Persian Gulf War. America injected billions of dollars and armaments to Iraq to confront Iran and to position Baghdad on a victorious stand. Years later we fought them and confront them aiming at us with our own M-16 rifles. Are we ready to face the same scenario if Mubarak steps down from government? Besides the accusations of corruption that most likely great percentage of the injected money to Egypt had to be secluded somewhere else but Cairo, the faith of the peace processes is important and unpredictable at this point. Israel is at danger with the spread of the cancerous violence of Radical Islam as well as the United States. What Anwar Sadat agreed in 1977 paid with his own life in 1981 when he was assassinated by the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, which opposed any sort of reconciliation with Israel. It is time for Mubarak to step-down, he has no choice. The Egyptian people are determined to put an end to thirty years of nothing but recession, unemployment, and hunger. We must be aware that Radical Islam is already in the veins of the nation system by birth and that diplomacy may not be the route to take when dealing with this Arab nation that sooner or later will rejoin its position to boycott Israel. A characteristic that shall not be overlooked is that it didn’t matter all the diplomatic relations, peace treaties, and good-faith promises between Egypt and Israel seasoned with promotion of tourism, trade, and agricultural benefits between these two nations when in fact anti-Israel propaganda pervades the Egyptian media as well as their educational system. The future of stability in the region is very unpredictable at this time. We wish for the prevalence of peace but we cannot overlook the decisive move of a corrosive Radical Islam in the region.

HAMAS: Jihad Remains Alive

Already known for being an unpredictable and ruthless terrorist organization, the Harakat al Muqawana al Islamiyyah –HAMAS has been responsible for numerous attacks on Israeli soldiers and innocent people.
The essence of its existence is to carry on with the destruction of the Israeli government, the eradication of the Jewish people and the reinforcement and establishment of Islam in the region. Its essence is similar to the Palestine Liberation Organization terrorist organization and it also rejects politics and diplomacy between Washington and the Palestinian Authority in regards to the acceptance of the Jewish State, its people safety and security, land demarcation and control over settlements, and the frustration of continuing with the existence of a Jewish world.
Hamas has been very inpatient with the prolonged efforts of the PLO to free the occupied territories by diplomatic means generating a coalition between Hamas and the Iranian government of Almadinejhad opposing to any peace treaty agreement between Israel and the PLO.
Hamas should not only be seen as a terrorist organization trying to destabilize peace in the region and should not be underestimated as a threat to the United States of America. Instead, Hamas should be given the necessary attention for its members’ commitment to self-immolation and its member’s sense of belonging to a large socio-religious movement, and its massive grass-roots support in the region. Its military body preserves the young life of its members for self-immolation, a very respected and glorified act to become a martyr. The Iranian monetary support for the families of the martyrs is essential to gain acceptance and more recruitment to include the expenses for resettlement of all suicide bomber families who lose their homes as a result of Israeli retribution.
The United States of America not only deal with Iraq and Afghanistan in the war against terrorism but with the constant Arab unification in their desperation to destroy Israel. After the PLO elections, Hamas was empowered itself by assuming high control of the PLO and has established better relations with Iran. Isn’t this a radical religious coalition we must give the necessary attention?
While we are fighting a war in Baghdad and Kabul trying to establish democracy we are lacking attention to terrorist organizations such as PLO and Hamas plus the Iranian aggression dressed diplomatically to avoid detection. The war in Iraq has benefit Iran in many aspects, leaving it as the only regional power that was endowed with both a large population and plentiful natural resources, and increased state power and control over minor states breathing radical and fanatical oxygen. With the assassination of Benazir Bhutto in Pakistan by the extremists of Al Q’aeda, as pointed out, and with the terrible outcome of the war against terrorism in Iraqi soil, the United States of America is far from winning this war and it is provoking the regrouping of not only Al Q’aeda but other terrorist organizations in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Yemen, and Sudan, for example, to minimize its vulnerabilities and somehow upgrade their underground operations, all as part of a well organized military body.
Allahu Akbar, and Mawt lil-Yahud greeted all the speakers in a 1995 Hamas rally in Gaza. It means: “God is Great, Death to the Jews”, as reported by Steven Emerson to the US House of Representatives early 1996. Their jihad spirit has not died; it still vivid and we must do something about it. We have to dismantle terrorist organizations from its roots, every single one, every single terrorist, every single organization committed to interrupt or threat world peace. In other words, have a real war against terrorism without taking in consideration any type of interests. There is a new era of Palestinian self-rule with the addition of Hamas influence, this injection of venom is prepared to deliver the most outrageous and sanguinary terrorist attacks in the promised-land and abroad, and the increment in proliferation of weapons, explosives, and terrorist training is backing up their commitments. Hamas was hungry for power and right after its political triumph in 2006, less than a year after Israel’s withdrawal from this coastal enclave, the terrorist organization has been meticulously observing Israeli security to obstruct peace and continue with their bloody agenda. It doesn’t matter if Sunnis and Shiites are not in agreement with everything, but be sure that they both agree in wiping out Israel from the face of the world.
Hundreds of treaties, pacts and diplomatic conversations were delivered during the Arafat era. Have those been any good? He always tried to keep the Israeli-Palestinian relations at a “manageable level” as expressed by Steve Emerson in his report, but there was never a real commitment to stop PLO aggression, or to condemn Hamas death squads operations in the region. Internal PLO corruption entertains its members when they don’t think in attacking Israel, which it tell us that some kind of weak foundation brick is about to collapse if not completely, but at least sporadically. The tinted spirit of the organization is tarnished a little bit if not a lot of the new Hamas majority, source of full commitment to eradicate Israel and recuperate land in the region. They are so involved and determined to do so that they are currently looking foreign contributors to compensate for any cutoff of Western donor funds. So lets pay attention to Iran, Saudi Arabia, and other Arab state in the Gulf region.

HAMAS: Against Israel and Fatah

Between the State of Israel, The Palestinian Authority, and Hamas relies the complicated formula for peace in the region. As easy as it may sound, it is not. Mr. Abbas, the leader of the PA and head of the Fatah political has been trying to negotiate more with Israel to obtain better treatment, more opportunities, and less hectic measurements to avoid crippling the PA finances.
The West Bank, for example, has demonstrated more progress, if this is the right word, than in Gaza Strip. Productive Israeli-Palestinian meetings may have been the reason for it as well as less firm checkpoints and roadblocks that cripple the economy. Abbas has full control of the West Bank but cannot impose the same in Gaza Strip; the main reason is Hamas. International aid agencies put Gaza’s poverty rate at 80 percent, and most Gazans survive on United Nations handouts and aid from Hamas’ patrons, such as Iran (Foreign Affairs, Volume 89, No. 5, page 50).
Hamas still broadcasting to the Palestinians in Gaza that the Fatah political strategy is too open to communication with Israel even though Israeli rockets damaged their soil. Hamas try to disintegrate all diplomatic relations between Palestine and Israel but encounter Abbas in the middle. Hamas obtained more power since they are the majority in congress after the 2006 victory and are always pushing for the continuance of violence against Israel as well as maintaining vivid the desire of the complete destruction of the Jewish state.
The alternatives for peace include more effective communication and diplomatic resolutions between Hamas and Israel’s National Security Council, retake Gaza before Hamas get any stronger, or increase economic pressure and military operations to preempt terrorist attacks from Gaza into Israel. The most desirable event is to turn Hamas to be more cooperative with the PA and support Abbas rather than be against him. However, as the days pass by, Israelis still fear that Hamas continue building its capabilities, obtaining more economic support from other Arab nations, and deal with the reality that in Gaza Strip other minor terrorist organizations start to flourish, like the Salafi jihadist terrorist group. In the meantime, Washington will continue to broker peace talks and diplomatic encounters, a well-known melody nobody is willing to dance. President Obama will continue pressing Israel to ease the blockade, elimination of some of the restrictions, and to trust the United States for help when needed. History can show us that Hamas does not welcome diplomatic negotiations. They are willing to die for the cause and for the destruction of the State of Israel. One thing is for sure, Hamas is growing militarily and in members committed without hesitation to destroy Israel, and if possible, any Palestinian not focused on the same objective. Iran is behind the curtains shuffling money, armament, and providing training to its members. Hamas has diminished and almost stopped attacking Israel not because it is abiding by any diplomatic agreement but because the benefits overweight the cost, at least for now. Hamas also admits that hitting more Israeli civilians, especially with the longer-range Katyusha rockets it will give Israel an excuse to hit Gaza and kill 2,000 people according to Hamas top leaders.

The False Religion of Peace

In the year 610 A.C., a commerce man called Mahoma misinterpret the sacred books of Christians and Jews and self-proclaimed as the Prophet from God (Apoc.216:13). He claimed that Jesus was a simple prophet and that even Jesus announced him as the Savior. This is how Islam was born and along with it, the Quran, a triturated version of the Bible and the Torah.
History has witnessed the numerous Christian populations and settlements that fell under Muslim governance, torturing their political and religious representatives, executing all those who oppose to conversion, slavering children, and demolishing religious infrastructures other than Muslim, and building more Mosques to establish a well settlement in place.
Islam contains political and religious ingredients in its foundation with the purpose of disseminating terror around the world by executing threats and paramilitary activities “in the name of Allah.” With the fall of the Ottoman Empire after WWII, Islam suffered a huge impact that weakened its political and religious structure, but the promise against the Christian and Jewish worlds remained pending and never forgotten. From the Islam perspective, the Occident needs to be annihilated at whatever cost. The promise to regroup and be a strong force in Europe was part of the strategy that today we can see it as an accomplished goal. Muslim cleric Qaradawi from Egypt affirmed that the regain of Europe was a victory for Islam.
If we pay attention to the spread of Islam in the world we can easily determine that it hasn’t been peaceful but a bloody corrosion. In Africa, for example Jihad has expanded tremendously raping non-Muslim women, destroying nom-Muslim houses of worship, imposing fear, threatening and killing people, and forcing entire communities to conversion into Islam. On October 6, 2006 in Ethiopia suffered hundreds of assassinations during a confrontation between Christians and Muslims. A group of Muslims opposed to the Christian celebration of Meskel, a religious party of the Orthodox Church. On December 18, 2007 thirteen businesses were destroyed by the evil hands of pro-Muslim forces. In the city of Copto it was prohibited to build or even repair churches of non-Muslim nomenclature, and higher taxes were imposed by the government for being a non-Muslim population. In Asia, for example Jihad has also expanded tremendously. On October 24, 2005 three Indonesian teen girls, Theresia Morangke, Yarni Samubue, and Alfita Poliwo were decapitated for resisting to converting into Islam. On September 22, 2006 three Indonesian Christian men executed for plotting attacks against Muslims. In Philippines, Islamic guerrillas decapitated many Christian preachers in the city of Jolo. In Oriental Timor, the orphanage Juan Bautista was attacked by Muslim militants and many of the female students were sexually abused. Also, 15 Christian preachers were assassinated in the cities of Dili and Boucau. Thousands of Christians have left the Middle East due to the constant threat of Muslims such as in Lebanon, where Christians represent now half of the population.
The future of the world is critical. Europe is already “Eurabia” with over 50 million of Muslims responding to the predictions of Ayatollah Ali Jamenei of Iraq, who saw this occupation coming without the guns and swords.
We don’t have to go too far to experience the spread of Islam. Both of our borders are sensible and exposed to the smell and dark cloud extremists usually possess; Canada population of Muslims have increased tremendously in the last decade, and Mexican cities are already tasting the conversion of its citizens into Islam. Are we ready to confront the reality of a corrosive spread of Islam?

Radical Islam: A Growing Cancer

Without a doubt, the events of September 11, 2001 marked the initiation of the efforts to fight terrorism. We did not know the enemy’s nature, short and long term capabilities, vested commitment to destroy our nation, and what strategy to use to neutralize, control, and eliminate the threat of the enemy.
The good thing is that we were conscious enough to understand that terrorists meant business and that their commitment goes beyond seriousness and extremism. The bad thing is that after more than 10 years of war shifted from Iraqi to Afghani territory, the leader of Al Q’aeda, Osama bin Laden still is at large. The war has affected also our allies and their compromise to team up in the fight against terrorism. By the time America understood the significance and popularity of the growth and danger of Radical Islam, European nations’ power has long since faded due to the expansion of the cancerous virus called Radical Islam. An ongoing mistake America embraces from one administration to the next is to see the Middle East as cleanly divided between two arenas: a moderate, pro-American that ought to be bolstered and a militant, pro-Iranian one that needs to be contained. That conception is not the reality and we must not continue seeing this as such because it does not allow intelligence strategists to counter attack the threat efficiently. America still ignores the role of new prominent elements at the door of terror such as Turkey as a clear sign of not realizing the changes in the composition of the Middle East. If we ignore those changes, we are making it more complicated to understand the political changes in the region. How are we going to assess Saudi Arabia’s resumed dialogue with the terrorist organization Hamas? How are we going to assess the Saudi ties with Syria? How are we going to asses Damascus’ regime involved in the shipment of armament and explosives to the terrorist organization Hezbollah? How are going to assess the strength and rapid alliance of Iran with Syria, Yemen, and Damascus? And, how are we going to assess the relations with Turkey when this nation has developed strong ties with Syria, mediating a nuclear deal with Iran, and proven to have strong ties with the terrorist organization Hamas?
We started the war on terror by invading the wrong country; that’s a fact. However, the capture of Saddam Hussein created the curtain to disregard negative comments about this erroneous first step and the invasion became the masterpiece of the entire strategy. The problem was that we failed to maintain a strong and direct defined objective as we did during Desert Storm during the George H.W. Bush administration by forcing Iraq out of Kuwait territory in 1991. Consequently, the assembly of multi-national forces maintained strong political ties for years to come, as it did, better than before, the results of the peace conference in Madrid to improve the relations Arab-Israeli. The Clinton administration contained Iran and Iraq while managing the Arab-Israeli everlasting conflict through diplomacy. Between 1991 until the end of the Clinton administration, America was able to neutralize the region’s three most critical arenas of conflict: the Arab-Persian fault line, the occupied Palestinian territories, and the time-bomb called Lebanon. During the George W. Bush administration, the handling of the crystal ball of the Israeli-Arab affairs shifted more to the Israeli side and the Intifada of 2000 put the Palestinians and all the terrorist groups they support in a situation that only grew more and throw the pendulum to the opposite side of the political relations in the region.
The George W. Bush policy of “with us or against us” to fight terrorism created animosity toward the United States and it promptly became widespread. We were at war and we needed to deal with animosity as in any other military intervention. The results of the war 10 years later reflect the total destruction of the sanguinary regime in Iraq but it allowed Iran spread its influence beyond its borders toward the Arab world. Hezbollah has strengthen its forces and commitment to annihilate anti-Muslims, and the bankruptcy of peace processes boosted Hamas and gave the terrorists the clear arena to adhere to the fatwa issued in 1998 by Osama bin Laden. What have we done wrong to allow Syria its continuance in relations with Radical Islamist terrorist organizations? What have we done wrong to allow Hezbollah infiltrate the political hemisphere in Lebanon? What have we done wrong when trying to sit in the same table Israel, Saudi-Arabia, and Iraq if these critical chess-pieces never shared neither values nor interests? What have we done right or maybe we think is right but it is just an invisible strategy from Syria to be willing to negotiate peace relations with Israel while Iran has openly called for its destruction? Practically, no country in the Middle East has a positive agenda or is in a position to successfully advance one as long as Radical Islam heart still beating.
It won’t be easy for the United States to undertake strong, effective, and lethal measures against Radical Islam. It may increase regional divisions, increase more tension, and increase the chances of more conflicts in different territories. President Barack Hussein Obama started his administration with the unmistakable decision and ambition of reversing the results of the war on terrorism but he has forgotten to close the book on failed policies and strategies of the past, and design a strong arrow that carries the strongest venom to the heart of Radical Islam.

Islamic Fatwa vs. American Political Correctness

Is this the time to start racial and religious profiling? Can this approach be the response or process to the TSA increasing safety measures and security? The answer is yes, at least this is the opinion and recommendation of Asra Nomani, a Muslim who supports religious and racial profiling to enhance the security of airports and other points of entry to the United States. We have embraced the nation into so many political correctness attitude that is choking us and does not let us fight back the forces of aversion, which is represented by Radical Islam. In 1998, Osama bin Laden issued a "fatwa" indicating that airlines and airports are legitimate targets for Muslims. The response can be easily seen in the threats and or terrorist activities in Glascow, London, JFK, and others as well as airlines attacks with one common denominator called "Muslim." Nomani indicated that we can be discriminating wihout being discriminatory. It is time to focus on the threat of terrorism and forget the stupid and unnecessary political correctness when dealing with the leprosy of humanity, terrorists. Osama bin Laden was serious about the decret and took charge of an international plan, which continues to be the threat to the Western hemisphere, especially the United States as it is against the State of Israel. While the leader of Al Q'aeda plans and executes according to the fatwa, Americans worry about political correctness and still surviving an almost failed war on terrorism going into its eleven year. Religion and race have to be part of the threat assessment for the intelligence community. It is a matter and need of being realistic of the perpretators, the countries they are coming from, the language they speak, the frequency they travel, and the way they dress. The assessment needs to be conducted constantly and meticulously. The concern of civil rights movements will always interfere when pulling the racial profile card, and this is enough for politicians that do not concentrate on the real threat but the feelings of groups concerned mostly on their rights than on the nation's sovereignty.

Threat After the Livermore Study Group: Radical Islam

"Of all the threats that could inflict major damage to the US, terrorists using weapons of mass destruction is the threat for which the nation is least prepared," was the conclusion of a 1996 inteligence study chaired by former Central Intelligence Agency director James Woosley. Known as the Livermore Study Group, its main objective was to identify current threats against the United States, as to the ways to mitigate risk, and to have a better management and knowledge of weapons of mass destruction that may end up in the wrong hands.
Usually the wrong hands are correlated with the wrong brains and any adversary to Western culture is a potential threat. A national nascent policy that addresses the threat of weapons of mass destruction does not help much either. How do our enemies see this new phase in our national security system? Very tentative.
The threat of Iran, North Korea, China, India, Yemen, Afghanistan, and similar nations is vivid. The chaotic and uncontrollable border security between the American and Mexican lines adds wood to the terrorism fire. The familiarization, commercial trading, and establishment of mutual relations between North Korea, Iran, and Venezuela, descentralizes the threat to the southern part of the hemisphere making it a broad and massive threat to our resources. The spread of the threat will go as far as we allow it to go. The threat is against us and we must act promptly, firmly, and effectively.
No control and/or elimination of the threat will be ever successful with diplomacy. We continue experimenting with diplomacy because our nature takes over. We need to shift to the execution of strategies that abolishes the threat from its roots. If this means to put to sleep every terrorist caught, this is exactly what is going to bring victory. No other plan will be victorious, no other alternative will defeat terrorism, no diplomacy has ever been effective against terrorism, and no mercy shall be impossed when dealing with the threat of radical Islam.
The Livermore Study Group has warned us of the need of multilayered defense from detection and prevention to reversal and response to counterrest the threat of weapons of mass destruction. Taking in consideration that the study was done 14 years ago as a proactive approach after the 1993 coward terrorist attack to the World Trade Center in New York City, and the 1995 henious terrorist attack to the Alfred Murray federal building in Oklahoma City, the threat of terrorism has been given attention but not the necessary one.
In 2001, the conclusion of an unfinished business was clear after the complete destruction of the world economic icon, the World Trade Center. World report footage has shown Islamic celebrations around the world for what for us were tears, for them were joyful parties.
The Livermore Study Group could not predict that a WMD by the denomination of "aircraft" was possible or tentatively useful for the radicals that died in the name of their God. No further intelligence study has proposed that dying in the name of God is considered a threat to our society. Religion and politics does not mix, to some scholars. Religion is as powerful as it is politics; the only difference is that politicians have the control of the dissemination of news, reports, and critical and real threats. The people will be exposed to what governments are allowing them to know. This is not a matter of democracy, republic, dictartorship, or anarchy. This is a matter of a rusty, nasty, and controlled political agenda that acts like a virus in all societies. However, religion is blantly and straightforward. We, Americans are the enemy of Islam. The world population is changing and nations around the world are experiencing Muslim growth, and so is the threat. Radical Islam is committed to erradicate all of those that are not Muslims, period.
The point is made. Can we adopt a diplomatic approach to prevent the enemy from killing us? I think, this question needs to be answered by Barack Hussein Obama, the first president of Muslim roots. The threat of weapons of mass destruction still latent while Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, and North Korea are still hosting terrorists to attack our freedom.

History of Ignorance: What America is Good at.

By unanumous decision a city commision panel approved the project of building a mosque nearby ground zero in New York City.
Great wars have been won due to the use of tactical psychological operations, and this may be the one tactic to the Muslim world to enter deep in the heart of democracy to disseminate hate, and jihad to the United States.
The mosque, which is similar to say "house of terror," cannot be built nearby, nor far away in our own soil. Our history of tolerance, compassion, and ignorance is allowing for this to happen.
Besides the fact that this project is a direct spit in the tombs of the martyrs and victims of the suicidal, coward, and henious terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, it also represents our weakness, and empathy with the evil forces of aversion that are eliminating worldwide the parameters of democracy.
France, England, and Canada to name a few nations, have ben invaded by the leprosy of Islam as a time-bomb ready to explode. They are just sleepers.
The Department of Homeland Security forgot to include entities such as the US Department of Labor, and US Department of Education, to name a few to regulate, control, identify, and eliminate sources of Islamic context oriented to the dissemination of terrorist interests throughout the channels of our freedom.
Building a house of terror nearby ground zero is a total disrespect that politicians still don't get it . The ignorant politicians excuse themselves by indicating that in America we have the right of freedom of religion and freedom of assembly. The house of terror will be pretty soon packed with anti-American law, anti-American freedom, and everything they can in the name of the Almighty.
Wake up America!! You are the only 100% responsible party in this huge, exhaust, and terrible decision maker. America does not need mosques, it needs schools. America does not need jihad, it needs freedom.

Do not be ignorant of what is happening in your own house,
Be firm and never let the excrement of mankind, radical Islam, be near you at anytime.

A Desperate Call to Fight Terrorism in the World

Terrorism has been defined as an evil force aimed to destroy democracy, beliefs, and ways of life by groups totally infected with fanatic passion for accomplishing their goals by impossing them no matter what. Currently, the United States is fighting a war against terrorism, and after 4,000 dead soldiers, we still not able to find the horse's rein to stabilize and control the Al Q'aeda's forces.
Somehow, the war in Iraq was labeled a war against terrorism, a necessary film but with the wrong actors. What about transferring the war to Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, and Sudan? Why do we still negotiating with the PLO, an authentic terrorist organization that supports the total erradication of the State of Israel? Why the American government seems to ignore the rethorics of Ismail Haniyeh, leader of Hamas, another authentic terrorist organization?
If we are going to fight a war against terrorism, we must focus on the real perpetrartors of terror. We must aim our deadliest weapons and sabers to the heart of Hizbollahs, Hamas, Al Q'aeda, and PLO. There should not be room for negotiations nor diplomatic reunions. We need to understand that we cannot continue to be naive and think that negotiations will resolve the problems and the threats of terrorism. Terrorists are the leprosy of humanity that need to be erradicated from its roots immediately.
Jihad has been called, the Jewish people has been threatened and killed, the courageous men and women of the IDF defend the soil and occupied settlements to protect the safety and peace of their people.
Muslims are good people, as Catholics, Jews, Protestants, Hindus, etc. But there are also bad Catholics, bad Protestants, and bad Muslims. Whoever disrupts peace, attacks innocent people, committs henious crimes, and joys himself with the killing of who he or she considers enemies, should be executed.
Terrorism is not a sickness that can be treated with some dosis of medicine day by day until is cured. Terrorism is a sickness that needs to be treated with surgery to remove the malign molecules immediately. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is one of those molecules.
No more negotiations with the PLO, no more concessions to Hizbollahs and Hamas, and lets stop the henious crimes committed against the people of Israel, their sovereignty, their pride, their nation, their spirit, and their democracy. Lets start the surgery immediately!
(Original article posted on the Jewish newspaper website IsraPost, by Victor Guembes, 08/12/2007)